Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Board of Adjustment <br />June 26, 2008 <br />#SE 08-001 <br />Page 2 of3 <br />Analvsis : <br /> <br />Conclusion: <br /> <br />The Code of Ordinances defines a special exception as a specified <br />enumerated deviation from zoning regulations. The Board is empowered to <br />grant a special exception when it finds the following: <br /> <br />.:. Granting the exception will not adversely affect the value, or use of <br />neighboring property. <br /> <br />.:. Granting the exception will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br /> <br />The applicant's request is based on Section 106-191 (b )(2)( c), which states <br />the following: <br /> <br />. To deviate yard requirements in the following circumstances: a yard <br />exception on corner lots. <br /> <br />The applicant recognizes contributing factors played a role in this situation. <br />The initial factor was the property survey's lack of reference regarding <br />building setback requirements and subsequently, the developer did not <br />contemplate the requirement for 10' side building lines on comer lots. The <br />developer has stated that, there are number of structures built in the area <br />having 5' side building lines and allowing an exception to the side set back <br />would not create a visual obstacle for vehicular traffic or motorists. For <br />similar reasoning and for neighborhood consistency, it does not violate the <br />spirit of the ordinance. In addition, 35' front yard setback in lieu of25' shall <br />allow to preserve existing trees and visual clearance to the motorists or <br />turning vehicles. <br /> <br />Based on the facts noted above, the Board is charged with deciding whether <br />the applicant's request for a five-foot (5') comer lot yard exception is <br />"reasonable" and that the granting of the special exception will not adversely <br />affect the value and use of adjacent or neighboring property, or be contrary <br />to the public's best interest. <br /> <br />Since Staff s responsibility is to enforce applicable City codes and <br />ordinances, we note that the applicant's proposal conflicts with zoning <br />regulations. However, staff also recognizes the uniqueness and intent of the <br />ordinance is to address sight visibility for vehicular traffic and to establish a <br />safe setback from through traffic movement. Staff research shows that based <br />on the speed limits and curve radii at the referenced intersection, the <br />additional 10 feet of front setback for the proposed side lot setback request <br />will result in no encumbrances to the sight triangle. <br />