Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Board of Adjustment <br />August 28, 2008 <br />#V08-005 <br />Page 2 of3 <br /> <br />Analysis: <br /> <br />Section 1 06-192(b)(1), in the Code of Ordinances, defines a variance as a <br />deviation from the literal provisions of the chapter, which is granted by the <br />Board when strict coriformity to the chapter would cause an unnecessary <br />hardship because of the circumstances unique to the property on which the <br />variance is granted. <br /> <br />Section 106-1 defines fence as ". . . the manmade structural barrier erected on <br />or around a piece of property." <br /> <br />Except as otherwise prohibited, the board is empowered to authorize a <br />variance from a requirement when the board finds that all of the following <br />conditions have been met. <br /> <br />.:. That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the best public <br />interest. <br /> <br />.:. That literal enforcement of the chapter will result in unnecessary <br />hardship because of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, <br />topography or other extraordinary or exceptional physical situation <br />unique to the specific piece of property in question. "Unnecessary <br />hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property itself as <br />distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, financial <br />considerations or caprice, and the hardship must not result from the <br />applicant or property owner's own actions; and <br /> <br />.:. That by granting the variance, the spirit of the chapter will be observed. <br /> <br />Regarding this request, the relief being sought to: <br /> <br />. Allow construction/relocation of a fence in the front yard setback. <br /> <br />In determining if granting the applicant's request would be contrary to the <br />public interest, Staff recognizes that the development of the fence at the <br />property may not create a problem with adjoining properties. A survey of <br />surrounding properties shows that this non-compliance with the ordinance is <br />typical to the area. <br /> <br />The issues to consider are impact on neighboring property and the best <br />public interest. In this case, it appears that the fence will serve to provide a <br />uniform setback of adjacent properties and should not be injurious to the <br />public. The applicant wishes to keep the fence in place by obtaining a City <br />building permit; however, staff is unable to issue a permit based on the <br />conflict with the zoning regulations. <br />