My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
01-27-10 Special Called Regular Meeting and Public Hearings of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2010's
>
2010
>
01-27-10 Special Called Regular Meeting and Public Hearings of the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2017 4:36:16 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:11:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/27/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Staff Report <br /> <br />March 25, 2010 <br /> <br />Variance Request #V10-001 <br /> <br />Requested by: <br /> <br />Requested for: <br /> <br />Location: <br /> <br />Zonin!!:: <br /> <br />Back2round: <br /> <br />Mr. Julio Cruz, property owner <br /> <br />Block 26, Lot 9; Fairmont Park East, Section 3 RIP <br /> <br />10833 W. Mulberry Drive <br /> <br />Low- Density Residential (R -1 ) <br /> <br />Harris County Appraisal District (HCAD) record shows that the house was <br />built in year 1984. This is a standard subdivision lot with land area <br />(66'x11O') equals 6,600 square feet and total living area of the house is <br />1,440 square feet. <br /> <br />The swimming pool design proposed by the applicant, if placed on the lot in <br />question, does not comply with the City's Code of Ordinances. <br />Subsequently, the building permit was denied. The design of the proposed <br />pool itself does not present a problem. The conflicts deal with placement of <br />the pool with relationship to the house and utility easement in the rear yard. <br />The applicant believes reducing the size of the pool would leave it <br />inadequate for his family's needs. <br /> <br />The applicant contends amending the size of the pool is not feasible and <br />practically it will encroach upon the required setbacks. So, the property <br />owner is requesting the Board to consider granting a variance to alleviate the <br />problem. <br /> <br />Based on the City's ordinances, minimum setbacks for a swimming pool are <br />as follows: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Measuring from the water's edge of the pool, a 6' setback from any <br />adjacent structure is needed. <br />Measuring from the water's edge of the pool, a 3' setback from a utility <br />easement is needed. <br />Measuring from the water's edge of the pool, a 5' setback from the side <br />property lines is needed. <br />A deck (walking area) around the pool may abut a utility easement but <br />may not encroach. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.