My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
08-25-16 Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2010's
>
2016
>
08-25-16 Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/3/2021 3:01:32 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:11:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
8/25/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. A spacing between driveways of 4'; contrary to the provisions of Section 106-835; <br /> Figure 10-2,which requires a minimum of 10' between residential driveways. <br /> 4. A distance from the driveway to the property line of 2'; contrary to the provisions of <br /> Section 106-835; Figure 10-2,which requires a minimum distance between the <br /> driveway and side lot line of 3'. <br /> Chairman Rothermel opened the public hearing at 6:10. <br /> a. Staff Presentation <br /> Planning Technician Cramer presented staffs report for variance request 16-93000007. <br /> Planning Technician Cramer said the driveway regulations from the City made it <br /> impossible for a townhouse development to meet all of the proper setbacks. While on <br /> the other hand there was not a true hardship for going over density requirements or <br /> needing a side setback variance. <br /> Staff recommended use of architectural features to distinguish one townhome unit from <br /> the one it is connected to. <br /> b. Applicant Presentation <br /> Jon Skeele, Friendswood, Texas, was sworn in by Chairman Rothermel. The applicant <br /> noted the Northside, where his tracts are, is under developed and creating a higher <br /> desnity use is a good transition from the commercial uses on Broadway. Being adjacent <br /> to the City's Hike and Bike Trail to the north gives their development the buffer the code <br /> was pursuing when they wrote the section they are asking for a variance from. <br /> c. Public Comments <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Chairman Rothermel closed the public hearing at 6:22 PM. <br /> d. Question and Answer <br /> Chester Pool asked how the City came up with its density requirement. Planning <br /> Technician Cramer indicated, as had been told to him,when the changes to Chapter 106 <br /> were being made, staff looked at the surrounding communities and used a number they <br /> thought was good. <br /> Nettie Warren noted she felt the project was a lot of development on such a small <br /> amount of land. <br /> Variance 1. Motion by Doug Martin to approve a side setback of 5'for Lot 32, Block 107 and Lot <br /> 1, Block 108; contrary to the provisions of Section 106-333(a) of the Code of Ordinances that <br /> requires a minimum side setback of 20'for a townhouse/quadraplex project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.