My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-18-13 Special Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
Agenda packets
>
City Council
>
2013
>
02-18-13 Special Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2013 8:26:57 AM
Creation date
4/3/2025 3:05:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
2/18/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F.Inspections <br />Findings <br />There are opportunities to improve the customers experiences asd <br />consistency. Many customer suggestions centered on interactivity improvements such topics as the <br />ability to submit permit applications, request inspections, or v-line. <br />Customers also requested improvements to consistency in the interpretations made by different <br />inspectors. Internally, there are several paper-based tracking processes that are redundant to <br />electronic processes. <br /> <br />Recommendations <br />1.Assign inspectors by project rather than geographically. This system will allow the <br />customer to have a consistent representative throughout the construction process; <br />other inspectors are still available to cover vacations or for c <br /> <br />2.Provide an opportunity for the assigned inspector to be involvedl <br />plan review before final approval. This system will reduce the occurrence of the field <br />inspectors enforcing codes differently than the plan reviewer. <br /> <br />3.Allow trade permits to be finalized as the work is completed pri <br />certificate of occupancy. Several customers commented that the current process does <br />not allow them to receive trade finals until the final certifica <br />building is approved. This practice causes delays in subcontrac <br />out their contracts and receive final payment. <br /> <br />4.The inspectors should use their iPads to document field inspecti <br />for direct transfer to the NaviLine system. The current process requires the inspectors <br />to hand-write notes and inspection results in the field. The results are then entered by <br />the Inspection Services Technicians into the NaviLine system. T <br />a method to electronically link the iPad with NaviLine needs to <br />change would free up office staff time and allow inspection results to be posted much <br />more quickly, while not adding additional work for the inspector <br /> <br />5.Implement an on-line inspection request system that could interface directly wit <br />NaviLine to save considerable staff time. The process of pulling inspection requests <br />from the answering machine, transcribing the information onto w <br />entering data into NaviLine is time-consuming. The current process of attaching the <br />white ticket to the inspection folder and then re-stapling it into the ticket book is <br />13 Planning Department Review Consulting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.