Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Rigby stated the tax rate as proposed by staff at $.71 per hundred. City Manager Alexander <br />replied yes, sir. Mayor Rigby stated that he knows at least two councilmembers have differing <br />opinions, and asked for discussion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Earp commented after reviewing the proposed budget with staff, he is not asking <br />for a reduction in the tax rate. <br />Councilmember J. Martin made a motion to keep the tax rate at $0.71 per $100 of property valuation, and <br />incorporate the budget changes discussed tonight. Councilmember Bentley seconded. <br /> <br />Mayor Rigby reminded Council that the budget is not being approved tonight; that will be on <br />th <br />September 10 agenda with a public hearing. There must be a public hearing before Council can <br />pass the budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zemanek commented he has some rough numbers from what Council did tonight; <br />we saved $1.95 million out of the budget and asked is this Council willing to earmark some of this <br />savings to moving forward with the project of the new fitness center? <br />Councilmember Earp commented he is in favor of it and was originally going to propose to allocate <br />about $2 million to start the funding, but to keep the budget fairly flat and not impact it from where <br />as far as the total dollars we were at, we would have to reduce it to start with to about $1.5 <br />million, which would get us to where we are kind of budget neutral from what we cut vs. to be able <br />to start our fund towards our rec center, . <br /> <br />Councilmember hesitant to earmark money for something that <br />we have no idea what . <br />Mayor Rigby stated the first thing Council needs to do is determine if it is something this Council <br />wants to do repair, upgrade, add on to the current one, or build a new one at another location. <br /> <br />Councilmember J. Martin asked what kind of account would we set up if we were to earmark funds? <br />City Manager Alexander stated we would have to set up a project, which is how we carry money <br />over year to year, like we would for any other CIP project; and we would allocate the dollars as you <br />funding allocation met your construction cost. <br /> <br />Councilmember J. Martin ask if Council did that, would the $1 million allocated out of the EDC be <br />taken out and put it into this fund? If we are not going to do an expansion, and we are going to look <br />at moving forward with new construction, would the EDC money be available for this fund? City <br />that question from a legal standpoint, he <br />believes the answer would be yes, because he does not think there is a legal difference between <br />expanding a fitness center and building a new one. <br /> <br />Councilmember Earp asked if Council approves the budget without earmarking money for certain <br />things, is Council free to come back two months from now if staff does due diligence and the <br />Council has time to look at something and figure it out, are we free to come back at that time and <br />move that money, because right now it would be just going into excess funds now, right? City <br />Manager Alexander stated that what would necessarily <br />benefits of the <br />Councilmember Earp stated get the benefits of the cuts and possibly earmark those for the projects <br />that were put forth. <br /> <br />Mayor Rigby stated what I heard you say is put the money that we reduce the budget by tonight into <br />a reserve fund and then two months, three months, whatever, from now, we come back and say we <br />want to allocate X amount to this project. City Manager Alexander said he just wants to make sure <br />we include whatever, if it <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />September 6, 2018 Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />