01-29-15 Special Called Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission

Browse Search

riruri;? Sri'} /rrliri�? r,rrrrrrrrirri P2 Jt r [ A t 't11, ]'Ii ,r;i J 1, Jtr „D f rr I,u up] -Orr riY sett P )ri Ilurtr,, I,,,11,41 Sr hrr)I Landscaping. The site development plan includes proposed landscaping in accordance with the provisions of Section 106-800 of the Code of Ordinances. Landscaping is required in locations adjacent to where site improvements have been proposed. The proposal includes street trees planted in various locations along the perimeter of the property as well as in locations where parking improvements are proposed. Parking and circulation. Section 106-838 of the Code of Ordinances outlines the city's parking requirements for high school uses. Specifically the code requires: 1 space per 4 students and 1 space per staff. Based on this ratio, the site is required a total of 838 parking spaces. The proposal includes the addition of 73 parking spaces, for a total at project completion of 876 spaces. Fire Hydrant Locations. This is one item that has not been fully resolved at the time of review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff recommends that a condition of approval be included with any approval of the site plan requiring the applicant to continue to work with the Fire Marshal on the location of hydrants on the site and to add any fire hydrants required. Drainage and detention. The attached Exhibit D is a copy of the Drainage Analysis Report prepared by the applicant's engineer. The City Engineer has reviewed the report for compliance with the city's Public Improvement Criteria Manual (PICM) and has accepted it. The proposal also includes the closing of an open drainage channel and facilitating the flow of that channel in an underground box culvert. This allows the applicant to utilize more of the property above ground for other improvements and to facilitate easier access across the site. The study identifies two alternatives and recommends the alternative that does not withhold the drainage getting to Galveston Bay. Additionally, the City Engineer concurs with the report's finding that the preferred alternative does not increase the water surface elevation and uses the pond as severe event overflow. In summary, the preferred alternative design will not impact the flow of water in the channel and will not impact properties up or down stream. Conclusion: Based on the analysis above, staff finds that the proposed Major Development Site Plan for the La Porte High School campus complies with the various applicable code requirements and should be considered for approval subject to resolution of the location of fire hydrants and the resolution of all items addressed in the city's review letter dated January 16, 2015.