Laserfiche WebLink
Question and Answer: Commissioner Follis inquiries about landscaping requirements and the <br />proximity of fire hydrants. Both of which have been achieved <br />Motion by Commissioner Kendrick to approve the Major Development Site Plan presented <br />to the commission <br />Second by Commissioner Warren Motion to approve carried. <br />Ayes: CommissionersBarrera, Follis, Smith, Tschappatt, Warren, Pitzer, Martin, Kendrick and <br />Chairman Lawler <br />Nays: None Motion to approve passes, 9-0 <br />Major Development Site Plan (6:06pm): Consider approval of the major development site <br />plan #18-83000002, Port Crossing Building A2; a 12.43 Acre development located at 1912 S. <br />th <br />16 St. <br />Staff Presentation: Mr. Ian Clowes, City Planner, presented staff’s report on a request of <br />th <br />approval for a Major Development Site Plan for a building to be located at 1912 S. 16. <br />164,000+ Sq. Ft Office/Warehouse development for the Port Crossing development. With no <br />outstanding comments, City staff has recommended approval of the Major Development Site <br />Plan. <br />Applicant Presentation: Mr. Jacob Fullerexplains to the commission the proximity to the rail <br />lines required the addition of “dry fire-lines” per the request of the City’s Fire Marshal to <br />meet fire code. Reiterates how Fire Marshal’s Office has provided a stamp of approval for <br />how the fire lane/plan has been drawn. <br />Question and Answer: Commissioner Follis asks if the site plan has a fire lane added that <br />meets the requirements of the International Fire Code. The designer of the project makes <br />note that the site plan had previously obtained FMO (Fire Marshal Office) approval. <br />Commissioner Follis requests that there is additional review to make sure that compliance is <br />met by the developer. Commissioner Follis also questioned the setback requirements for the <br />nearby pipeline for the property in question. <br />Motion by Commissioner Follis to approve the proposed site plan, with the condition that <br />additional review from the Fire Marshal’s Office would be required for the fire lane <br />requirements and pipeline set back requirements. <br />Second by Commissioner Smith Motion to approve Carried <br /> <br />