Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment Meeting <br />August 25, 2016 <br />Bayway Homes Variance <br /> <br /> <br />Analysis: <br />The applicant is seeking approval of a variance that would allow the applicant to build a new single <br />family attached townhouse development the 2 northern property lines, a <br />way to side <br />pr. <br /> <br />the literal interpretation of the code approved by the Board subject to the fact that enforcement of the <br />provisions of the code would cause an unnecessary hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />subject property. The Board is authorized to grant a variance when the Board finds that a number of <br />criteria are met. The following table outlines those criteria and stahose criteria: <br /> <br />Criterion: Staff Finding: <br />a. That the granting of the variance will not be Granting this variance would allow for a series of <br />contrary to the public interest deviations to help build a single family attached <br />townhouse development. As it currently stands, <br />all of the surrounding residential area is <br />undeveloped. The R-2 zoning allows for the <br />proposed use. <br />To the north of this project is the unimproved E <br />nd <br />St. right-of-way that at N. 2 St. is being used for <br /> Hike and Bike Trail. This creates a buffer <br />between the proposed development and the <br />commercial/industrial uses to the north. <br />b. That literal enforcement of this chapter will As it relates to driveway criteria in <br />result in unnecessary hardship because of townhouse/quadraplex developments, meeting <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, the code is difficult and likely impossible. <br />topography or other extraordinary or According to Section 106-333 referenced earlier, <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the <br />specific piece of property in question. <br />"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical you half the required distance between driveways <br />hardship relating to the property itself as <br />distinguished from a hardship relating to the minimum <br />convenience, financial considerations or driveway width. Section 106-839 requires 2 <br />caprice, and the hardship must not result from parking spaces minimum per household while <br />the applicant or property owner's own actions. Section 106-835 requires that each parking spot <br /> <br />wide but the City code <br />requires 2 <br /> <br />As it relates to density requirements and side <br />setbacks, staff finds it difficult to argue that there <br />is an unnecessary hardship preventing the <br /> <br />