Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment Meeting <br />December 13, 2016 <br />Bay Point Lot Size Variance <br />Additionally, in compliance with state law, notice of the public hearing was posted at City Hall and on the <br />City's website at least ten days prior to the date of the public hearing. <br />Background Information: <br />The site is currently zoned R-1, Low -Density Residential. The subject site has two existing residential <br />structures on site. The following table summarizes the surrounding zoning and land uses: <br />Zoning <br />Land Use " <br />North <br />R-1, Low -Density Residential <br />Residential (518 S. 3rd St.) <br />South <br />R-1, Low -Density Residential <br />Residential (606 S. 3rd St.) <br />West <br />R-1, Low -Density Residential <br />Residential (601 S. 4t" St.) <br />East <br />R-1, Low -Density Residential <br />Residential (601 S. 3rd St.) <br />icable Code Provisions: <br />Section 106-333, speaks to residential area requirements. The following is an excerpt from that section <br />as applicable to this variance request: <br />Uses <br />Minimum Lot Area <br />Minimum Yard Setbacks <br />L. F. F. R.S. <br />Single-family detached <br />6000 <br />25-15-5 <br />Analysis: <br />The applicant is seeking approval of a variance that would allow her client to replat his property into two <br />lots, both under 6,000 square feet, and allow the house on the western lot to maintain a setback smaller <br />than 25'. <br />Section 106-192 of the Code of Ordinances states that the term "variance" represents a deviation from <br />the literal interpretation of the code approved by the Board subject to the fact that enforcement of the <br />provisions of the code would cause an unnecessary hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />subject property. The Board is authorized to grant a variance when the Board finds that a number of <br />criteria are met. The following table outlines those criteria and staff's analysis of those criteria: <br />Criterion: <br />Staff Finding: <br />a. That the granting of the variances will not be <br />The use of both properties would be in line with <br />contrary to the public interest <br />the surrounding area and is the intention of the <br />zoning district. <br />The City requires minimum lot sizes and setbacks <br />as a way to protect property values and create a <br />consistent look amongst R-1 housing. <br />b. That literal enforcement of this chapter will <br />The size of the original lot makes it impossible for <br />result in unnecessary hardship because of <br />the lot to be platted into two conforming lots. <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, <br />The front setback cannot be met on the new <br />topography or other extraordinary or <br />western lot because of an existing house placed <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the <br />on the property by the original owner in 1940. <br />specific piece of property in question. <br />