My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
SGR Proposal
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Drainage Committee
>
2012
>
SGR Proposal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2024 9:02:53 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 9:48:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
aStrategies for Managing <br />Delegating <br />■ Tell her what result you need and by when; let her determine how to get it done <br />• Specify clearly the limits of authority and available resources, allowing autonomy within those limits <br />• Clarify understanding and acceptance of specific performance expectations and time frame for <br />completion <br />■ Establish dates for checkpoints with clear understanding of what is to be completed when <br />■ Help structure the process for completing the task, especially when dealing with complexity or <br />assignments requiring a methodical approach <br />Correctinq <br />■ Be firm and direct, specifying the desired result as well as current level of performance <br />■ Direct the discussion to what she Is going to do to eliminate the gap in performance <br />• Define time limits for improvements and state consequences clearly <br />• Resist attempts at side-stepping the problem by stating the performance problem and <br />consequences very specifically and clearly <br />• Direct the discussion to how she specifically will improve performance, avoiding extensive <br />discussions about other people and other situations <br />■ End discussion with a commitment about what result by when, focusing on the positive outcomes <br />of improving performance and looking good in the eyes of others <br />Decision-Makinq <br />■ Tends to be a quick decision -maker <br />■ May need coaching on taking time to gather sufficient information and considering possible <br />consequences before making decisions <br />■ Point out benefits in taking more time in terms of improved results <br />■ May tend to avoid making decisions involving negative consequences and/or interpersonal conflict <br />• Discuss how making a decision will reduce negative outcomes in the long-term and how <br />indecisiveness frustrates others and makes her look bad <br />® 2004 by Inscape PubCsh!ng, Inc. and The Gary little Company, Inc. All rights e + <br />reserved.Reproduction in any form, In wfio!e or in part, is prohibited. <br />19 u en vo'i Ies 'rLJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.