Laserfiche WebLink
Scoring System Factors <br />Economic/Fiscal Impact and Character of the Jobs <br />La Porte’s primary considerations when evaluating whether or not to offer an incentive <br />package is the potential aggregate economic and fiscal impact on the community and <br />the character of the jobs to be created. Standard questions asked when evaluating <br />firm-based incentives requests may include: <br /> What is the absolute size of the net benefit (economic and fiscal)? <br /> Is the firm a headquarters operation? Does it represent the “headquarters” of <br />a new product line/service for the firm? <br /> Is the firm growing? Is the firm in a growing industry? How stable is the firm? <br /> Does the project represent a significant enhancement of the local tax base <br />over and above the economic impact (i.e., a new entertainment/lodging facility <br />that can choose whether or not to locate in the city limits)? <br /> Will the project make a disproportionate demand on the community’s <br />environmental and infrastructure resources? <br />Policy Guideline #3: <br />Chapter 380 of the Texas Local Government Code, due to its flexibility and simplicity, <br />is likely to be the preferred vehicle for any financial incentive agreement between La <br />Porte and a potential recipient. <br />Within this structure, sales taxes, property taxes, and other fees paid by the company <br />could be eligible to be included in the agreement, although all should be returned, <br />rather than waived/abated. Property taxes can be an incentive for existing space as <br />well. For end-user purchase, La Porte can offer to structure an agreement that <br />returns, on a performance basis, the taxes that accrue based on the incremental <br />growth of the property over time. The same process could be applied to end-user <br />tenants, since commercial/industrial leases can be written as “triple net,” where the <br />tenant directly pays the cost of taxes, insurance, and utilities. <br />What this structure does is to insure that La Porte covers its costs before offering <br />incentives, while essentially forgoing the right to use the “profit” from the firm to cross- <br />subsidize residents (as with utilities, commercial property taxpayers tend to provide a <br />disproportionate share of revenue). At the same time, the community (and the city) <br />gain in a number of additional ways, such as economic activity in the form of jobs and <br />spending plus additional tax revenues. <br />Policy Guideline #4: <br />Financial incentives should not be “front-loaded.” Rather, the community should set an <br />incentive policy based on returning taxes and/or fees paid by a company upon <br />execution of a specific set of agreed-upon performance criteria between the applicant <br />and the City. <br />24 <br />Forward La Porte Economic Development Strategic Plan I 2009-2013 <br /> <br />