My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-18-13 Special Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Open Meetings
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
City Council Meetings
>
2013
>
02-18-13 Special Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2013 8:26:57 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 11:30:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
2/18/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
as applicable. These moves will consolidate technical criteria, allow easier <br />updating as warranted by new conditions or technology, and give <br />greater flexibility in granting common sense exceptions when n <br />expedite a project. <br />2.Development Ordinance recommendations: <br />i.General Comments: <br />1.The Development Ordinance should be codified to eliminate the need <br />for customers and staff to cross-reference multiple ordinance revisions <br />to determine the full code requirements. <br />2.Submittal copies: References to submittal or distribution of a specific <br />number of copies of various documents (general plans, plats, etc.) <br />should be removed from the ordinance and established by separate <br />policy so that staff can readily update the requirements based o <br />latest needs. <br />3.Submittal dates: References to specific submittal deadlines should be <br />removed from the ordinance and established by separate policy so <br />staff can readily update the requirements based on the latest ne <br />Additionally, as previously discussed, submittal and re-submittal <br />deadlines and review time goals should be established and published by <br />staff. References to statutory Planning Commission action deadlines <br />should remain in the ordinance. <br />4.Appendices: Staff should have the authority to update the appen <br />(technical specifications and procedures) as new conditions warrant. <br />This can be accomplished by adding a section to the ordinance <br />authorizing staff to update the appendices or by removing the <br />appendices from the ordinance and placing them in the criteria m <br />Regardless of which method is chosen, any staff changes to the <br />appendices should only be effective after an appropriate notice <br />waiting period, say 30 days, after posting the proposed change o <br />website. <br />5.Update the references to Director of Community Development, wh <br />is an outdated title. Use City Manager or designee to make the <br />reference more generic and flexible. <br />6.Do not put building setback lines on plats inside the city limits; rely on <br />zoning ordinance to establish setbacks to avoid potential confli <br />ii.4.00 Sketch Plans <br />The submittal of sketch plans is optional so it should be remove <br />Additionally, the intent of the sketch plan review process will <br />more fully if the pre-development meeting recommendations are implemented. <br /> <br />23 Planning Department Review Consulting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.