My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-18-13 Special Meeting of La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Open Meetings
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
City Council Meetings
>
2013
>
02-18-13 Special Meeting of La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2013 8:26:57 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 11:30:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
2/18/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ix.10.00 Fees and Charges <br />The fee schedule should be pulled from this ordinance and combin <br />city fees in a consolidated fee ordinance that can be readily re <br />annual basis or as needed. <br />x.12.00 Open Space and Park Dedication <br />State laws regarding park dedication requirements have been updated <br />subsequent to 1985 when the Development Ordinance was adopted. <br />section should be reviewed for conformance with current law. Ad <br />fee in lieu of dedication should be removed from this section an <br />with other fees for easier updating as needed. <br />3.Other Code Recommendations: <br />i.Industrial District water and sewer agreements are calculated ba <br />of employees Need an alternate method because the number of employees is <br />often not known at the time the agreements are prepared, particularly in the <br />case of companies starting new operations within the City. <br />ii.Comprehensive Plan sidewalk requirements: Develop a specific list of streets to <br />which the sidewalk requirements apply and corresponding sidewalkiteria; <br />place these requirements in the Development Ordinance. <br />iii.Resolve questions about whether or not fill dirt permits should <br />projects involving fewer than five loads. <br />iv.Establishing minimum finished floor elevations for infill development in the <br />floodplain could be accomplished with a pier and beam requirement rather than <br />by utilizing dirt fill to minimize the perception of run-off impacts on neighboring <br />properties. <br />v.Several focus group members suggested the removal of the requirement for <br />gates on dumpster enclosures as being impractical ineffective. <br />vi.Staff has compiled a list of proposed ordinance updates based on <br />experiences. This list should be presented to the Commission fo <br />recommendation to City Council. <br /> <br /> <br />III. Conclusion <br />The consulting team believes implementation of these recommendat <br />goals of improving the customer service responsiveness, efficieneffectiveness. We appreciate <br />this opportunity to be of service to the City and we are available for questions or additional <br />engagements to assist with the implementation phase. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />25 Planning Department Review Consulting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.