My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
03-14-22
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Open Meetings
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
City Council Meetings
>
2022
>
03-14-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2022 12:13:39 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 11:49:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM <br />Appropriation <br />Agenda Date Requested:March 14, 2022 <br />General Fund <br />Requested By:Teresa Evans, Director Source of Funds: <br />Department:Planning and Development <br />Account Number:001-9092-524-5007 <br />$18,000 <br />Amount Budgeted: <br />ReportResolutionOrdinance <br />N/A <br />Amount Requested: <br />Exhibits: Notifications and Access Report; Bid #22011 <br />Budgeted Item:YesNo <br />SUMMARY& RECOMMENDATION <br />The Inspections Division of the Planning and Development Department is responsible <br />for code enforcement,including the abatementof weeds/debris nuisance violations. In <br />accordance with Section 34-130 of the City of La Porte Code of Ordinances, the City <br />maytake action on code enforcement violations if the property owner fails to do so <br />within tendays of written notice. The City has established an annual mowing contract <br />to achieve compliance in cases where the property owner does nottake action. <br />Advertised Sealed Bid #22011 Annual Mowing Contract was openedand read on <br />February 15, 2022.The Bid Request was sent to 47 vendorsand 17 vendors opened <br />the documents. Only one (1) vendor responded witha bid. The bid received from Goins <br />Go Getters was unexpectedly high. For example, the bid to mow an average size <br />residential property went from $37.80 to $462.50. <br />Staff hasexperiencedsome difficulties withmanaging the annual mow contract.The <br />mow contractors have beendelayed in their responsesor unavailable. Quality control <br />has also been an issue. The most recent mow contractors have gone out of business <br />ordeclined additionalcityjobs due to underbidding their work. This is the second <br />Sealed Bid Proposal in the last twelve months where the City has received only one(1) <br />returned bid. Due to these reoccurring issues, staff isexploring the option of bringing <br />this service in-house, to be performed by the Parks Maintenance staff. By utilizing City <br />employees, there should be an increaseinquality control and responsiveness. <br />Staff recommendsCity Council reject bid #22011 for Inspection Mowing Services. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.