My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-09-18 Drainage and Flooding Committee Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Open Meetings
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
Drainage Committee
>
2018
>
07-09-18 Drainage and Flooding Committee Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 3:01:16 PM
Creation date
7/25/2025 11:51:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Drainage and Flooding Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
7/9/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IML <br />Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Coordination <br />The coordination with TCEQ may be necessary to determine the need for Municipal <br />Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) permit. This report did not evaluate the MS4 <br />requirements as it is outside the defined scope. <br />3. Existing Conditions <br />Drone Data Collection <br />The use of aerial photogrammetry for data collection of the pavement condition was <br />based on trends in the industry for increasing use of remote data collection, coupled <br />with increased visual capability of photogrammetry due to increasing camera <br />resolutions allowing for tighter (less than '/4 inch pixel resolution) imagery. The use <br />of hyper -spatial resolution (sub -centimeter or sub -inch) natural color aerial <br />photography (HSR-AP) was studied by the University of New Mexico and a <br />document was published in May 20168 outlining the results of aerial data imagery <br />and 3D surface modeling captured aerially and comparatively studied on the ground <br />by conventional methods with a comparison of the two methods. A sensitivity <br />analysis was made on the results of the two methods and the data collected for rut <br />depth, alligator cracking, and transverse cracking of flexible pavement in various <br />sites in New Mexico. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the <br />differences in measures between the aerially derived measures and the ground <br />measures were not statistically different, even at a 95% confidence level9. Because <br />of this accuracy, we proposed and collected data aerially to evaluate the pavement <br />condition and quantified pavement deterioration for rehabilitation on this project. <br />The aerial data collected for this report was gathered by two unmanned aerial <br />vehicles. The first (for 3D model derivation) is an Ebee fixed wing aircraft. This <br />aircraft gathered topographic information to derive a surface model of the site to use <br />with the drainage investigation. This platform also gathered a low -resolution <br />(comparable with Google Earth) imagery, but of the entire project area. The second <br />aircraft was a DJI Phantom quadcopter by Parrot. This aircraft collected much higher <br />resolution imagery to document pavement distress for condition assessment and <br />quantity calculations of pavement rehabilitation. <br />Conventional Survey Collection <br />Some data for the drainage investigation was not able to be obtained by remote <br />means. For this, the conventional on -the -ground survey was used for measuring <br />features like silted -in culvert flowlines and ditch and swale elevations that were below <br />8 Characterizing Pavement Surface Distress Conditions with Hyper -Spatial Resolution Natural Color <br />Aerial Photography by Zhang, Leppitt, Bogus, Neville, et al (University of New Mexico) republished by <br />Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 392. <br />9 Ibid, pg 14 of 23. <br />Page 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.