My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-09-18 Drainage and Flooding Committee Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Open Meetings
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
Drainage Committee
>
2018
>
07-09-18 Drainage and Flooding Committee Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 3:01:16 PM
Creation date
7/25/2025 11:51:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Drainage and Flooding Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
7/9/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IML <br />FIGURE 13 - POTENTIAL PIPELINE CONFLICTS <br />Discussions with Don Pennell will lead to design of drainage across the pipeline corridor <br />being set to avoid the pipelines, rather than relocating the pipelines. This will include inlet <br />structures on each side of the corridor, with a bored conduit sized to carry flow beneath all <br />the pipelines. The expected flowline will be below any drainage ditch flowline, but the inlets <br />will have access to allow for periodic de -silting of the structures. <br />6. Conclusions and Recommendations <br />By following the discussion of the design for each of the items listed for evaluation, the total <br />estimated construction cost for the project is in excess of $3.5 Million. This is far beyond the <br />programmed level of funding. However, the removal of components of the project will help <br />reduce the cost to bring it closer to budget. Therefore, the listing below removes a major <br />item, and removes components of two other items to reduce costs. <br />6.1. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION <br />The project as described above, but with the removal of the reconstruction of the western <br />portion of Taxiway A is recommended. Also, while desirable but not necessary, the spray <br />Page 132 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.