My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
05-24-12 Special Called Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Open Meetings
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Planning/Inspections
>
Planning and Zoning Commission
>
2012
>
05-24-12 Special Called Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2012 10:25:56 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 12:01:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
5/24/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />REVISED DRAFT APRIL 9, 2012 <br />4)Consider transitioning Transition the existing Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD) regulations to a Planned Development (PD) option available in <br />certain districts in order to mix different housing types. This by-right <br />option allows the density and open space standards to be clearly defined <br />to reflect the intended character. A housing palette should be utilized to <br />clearly specify the minimum lot areas and dimensions, setbacks, building <br />heights, and maximum building coverage for each dwelling unit type. <br />These new PD provisions would include explicit density and open space <br />standards together with provisions for permitted and limited uses, <br />housing diversity, dimensional criteria, residential and nonresidential <br />development standards, open space and recreation design, subdivision <br />layout and design, street configurations, and bufferyards and transitions <br />thereby allowing them as a by-right option rather than through a <br />discretionary approval process. <br />5)Consider reviewing and revising Review and revise the lists of permitted <br />and conditional uses in each district. The current districts are cumulative <br />meaning that single family dwellings are permitted in both low and high <br />density districts. The permitted uses in the commercial district are based <br />on their use function rather than their scale or design character. By way <br />of example, the neighborhood commercial district allows drugstores, <br />eating places, and grocery stores with limitations of scale or other design <br />parameters to ensure a character that is compatible with <br /> <br />the adjacent neighborhood. <br />6)Consider adopting Adopt a housing palette that <br />includes dimensional standards for each of several housing <br />types. The purpose of the palette is to ensure the character <br />(size, spacing, scale) of each housing type in a <br />neighborhood or mixed housing development, such as a <br />mixed use center or traditional neighborhood development <br />(THD). <br />7)For the purposes of procedural streamlining and to <br />better focus the appropriate locations of uses, consider <br />restricting the types and numbers of allowable conditional <br />Flexible bufferyards ensure that the scale of <br />uses. For those uses with performance standards, make <br />the bufferyard is commensurate with the <br />them a limited use whereby they are administratively <br />intensity and/or proximity (i.e., the character) <br />permitted subject to written standards. <br />of adjacent uses. In addition, a flexible <br />8)Consider amending Amend the ordinance to <br />bufferyard approach would provide multiple <br />include bufferyard provisions for ensuring improved <br />options (i.e., landscaping only, landscaping <br />compatibility between adjacent areas of different <br />and berm, or landscaping and fence <br />character. The bufferyards must vary according to the <br />structure) to achieve the same level of <br />intensity of abutting development, with a range of options <br />compliance, while providing the developer <br />(including combinations of buffer width, plant density, <br />with flexiblity to implement the one that is <br />earthen berms, and fencing) to meet a specified standard <br />most appropriate for their site and project. <br />of opacity. This would provide adequate buggering of <br /> <br />adjacent uses as well as street corridors. The existing <br />Source: Kendig Keast Collaborative. <br />provisions only specify a 25 foot buffer between multi- <br />2.34 <br /> <br />Chapter 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.