Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Redistricting Committee Meeting Minutes (Cont'd) <br /> August 28, 2001 - Page 2 <br /> Population numbers reflected the following: <br /> District 1 5650 +6% <br /> District 2 5598 +5% <br /> District 3 5,698 +6% <br /> District 4 5,099 -4% <br /> District 5 5,039 -5% <br /> District 6 5,420 +2% <br /> Sidney Grant noted the Committee would need to look at each block indiyidually to fine <br /> tune the numbers. The Committee agreed to take the map presented and look at ethnic <br /> groups within each district. It appears that while upholding the +/-5% population <br /> guidelines, the map as presented was a good attempt to ayoid retrogression. In addition, <br /> met all other criteria established by the City Council in the criteria ordinance. <br /> Masood Malik proyided the Committee with a breakdown. <br /> Ed Matuszak informed the group the targeted number per district is 5,313. A perfect <br /> target would be 266+ or 266-. <br /> Sidney Grant noted we would be able to obtain this target by fine-tuning the numbers to <br /> meet the +/-5%. <br /> The Committee discussed making the following changes to the next proposed map: <br /> Take in more of District 1 and add to District 4. The line would be drawn to out lot line <br /> on H Street. <br /> Pick up more in District 3 on Rocky Hollow. <br /> Bring the new map with numbers +/-5% as discussed. At that time the Committee can <br /> analyze against district breakdowns. <br /> The Committee noted the lines were drawn in accordance with the guidelines the <br /> Committee was required to follow. In addition, lines were moved to keep people with <br /> common interests in the same district, and to keep the incumbent in their district. <br /> Sidney Grant requested each district to state their opinion of map #R-005. Each member <br /> was pleased with the map. It was noted they would like to see Creekmont Subdivision be <br /> completely in District 3. <br />