Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment Meeting <br />November 10, 2016 <br />th <br />201 N. 18 St. Nonconforming Special Exception <br /> <br /> <br />(4) To deviate from the minimum lot size or width requirements for property within the large <br />lot district, where the board finds that all of the following conditions are shown: <br />a. That one or more lots located in the same block as the subject property are not <br />uniform in terms of shape and/or size so that any further subdivision of the subject <br />property cannot be in accordance with the regulations governing the district; <br />b. It can be demonstrated that the subdivision will not circumvent the spirit of the <br />district regulations, or particularly, the rural character of the district; and, <br />c. Granting the special exception will not be injurious to the value or enjoyment of <br />adjacent properties within the district. <br />(c) Hearings on applications for special exceptions. The board of adjustment shall fix a <br />reasonable time for the hearing of all applications for special exceptions, give public notice <br />thereof, as well as due notice to the parties in interest, and decide the same within a reasonable <br />time as specified in section 106-194 (Notice of public hearings before the board of adjustments). <br />Upon the hearing any party may appear in person or by agent or by attorney. <br /> <br />Section 106-839 stipulates the amount of parking required for specific uses within the city. In <br />this case the code requires the following parking: 4 parking spaces plus 1 per 400 square feet of <br />office (or a total of 5 parking spaces in this case). <br /> <br />Analysis: <br />Section 106-191(b) indicates that a special exception request can only be approved if it will not <br />adversely affect the value and use of adjacent or neighboring property or be contrary to the <br />best public interest. <br /> <br />In this case, the addition of a warehouse to an existing industrial site does not pose a significant <br />impact to the surrounding area. The applicant has stated that they currently are warehousing <br />product off site. The addition of an onsite warehouse space could greatly reduce the number of <br />truck loads in and out of the property, ultimately decreasing the overall truck traffic in the area. <br /> <br />Staff concurs with the applicant that the proposed expansion on site will enable an existing <br />business, currently thriving in the City of La Porte, to continue their operations on the site. The <br />applicant has indicated that the warehouse expansion will not increase production at the site, <br />but makes economical sense for the company at this time. <br /> <br />Appeal Procedure: <br />Sec. 106-196. - Appeals from the board of adjustment. <br />Any person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by any decision of the board of <br />adjustment, or any taxpayer, or any officer, department, board, or bureau of the city may <br />present to a court of record a petition for a writ of certiorari, as provided by V.T.C.A., Local <br />Government Code § 211.011, duly verified, setting forth that such decision is illegal, in whole or <br />in part, specifying the grounds of the illegality. Such petition shall be presented to the court <br />within ten days after the filing of the decision in the office of the board of adjustment. <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS <br /> <br />Exhibit A: Application <br />Exhibit B: Area map <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />