Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM <br />Budget <br />Agenda Date Requested:June 10, 2013 <br />Source of Funds: <br />Requested By:Jeff Suggs <br />Account Number: <br />Department:Administration/OEM <br />Amount Budgeted: <br />Report: XResolution:Ordinance: <br />Amount Requested: <br />Exhibits:Bidder’s List <br />Budgeted Item:YES NO <br />Exhibits: Bid Tabulation <br />Exhibits: <br />SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION <br />The City currently has an agreement in place for debris monitoring services, which was approved by City <br />Council on June 9, 2008 for a term of five (5) years. Following a disaster, these services are necessary to <br />monitor debris removal operations and providecomprehensive observation and documentation of work <br />performed from the point of debris collection to final disposal. <br />Following a disaster such as a hurricane, there will be an immediate need for debris management services. <br />The City has a FEMA-approved Debris Management Plan in place, which recognizes the need for pre- <br />qualified contractors to assist with debris management services following a disaster. In the aftermath of <br />such a disaster, the City will likely seek reimbursement through the FEMA Public Assistance Program. <br />Costs associated with debris management services may be eligible for reimbursement. The Sandy <br />Recovery Improvement Act of 2013permitsfinancial incentives for applicants who have at leastone pre- <br />qualified debris contractor. Failure to properly monitor debris removal operations may jeopardize Public <br />Assistance funding. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the City to have a monitoring agreementin <br />place prior to a disaster.This RFPwill not be utilized unless needed following a disaster that requires <br />debris removal throughoutthe City of La Porte. <br />Advertised, Sealed Requestsfor Proposals #13507 –Debris Monitoring Services wereopened and read <br />on May 21, 2013. Solicitation requests were advertised in the Houston Chronicle, posted on the City of <br />La Porte website and mailed out to fifteen(15)vendors with two (2)responding.The RFP allows for <br />award to a primary vendor and one backup vendor. <br />Copies of the returned proposals were sent to the Evaluation Committeefor review. The team evaluated <br />the proposals based on the criteria stated within each section of the RFP. Staff determined True Northas <br />the top respondent, withThompson Consulting as a backup vendor. True North is the City’s current <br />vendor for debris monitoring services. <br /> <br />