Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM <br />Agenda Date Requested: June 24, 2013 <br />Requested By: Tim Tietiens <br />Department: Planning <br />Report: X Resolution: Ordinance: _ <br />Exhibits: <br />1. Implementation Matrix - Immediate <br />2. Implementation Matrix - Short Term <br />3. Audit Report <br />Appropriation <br />Source of Funds: N/A <br />Account Number: <br />Amount Budgeted: <br />Amount Requested: <br />Budgeted Item: _YES _NO <br />SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION <br />At the February 25t' meeting of City Council, the Planning Department Audit Report was <br />presented along with a subsequent Implementation Matrix showing the priority and timeline for <br />delivery of each line item in the order listed within the report. The Implement Matrix listed the <br />report items into three different priorities for initiating action: immediate (those items to be <br />initiated within two months), short-term (those items to be initiated between two and six months), <br />and long-term (those items to be initiated between six and eighteen months). City Council directed <br />staff to report progress quarterly, and this item represents the first quarterly report. <br />For the purposes of reporting status, the Implementation Matrix items were sorted by the three <br />different priorities to initiate, and is being displayed via three separate matrices. Planning staff <br />started with the immediate priority matrix and has been meeting weekly to ensure the project is on <br />schedule. There was also some limited action on the short term items as well, so both matrices are <br />attached to this report. Each Implementation Matrix graphically shows the degree of completion of <br />each line item by a color coded Gantt chart with comments if applicable to that line item. <br />The attached Audit Report consists of the originally approved narrative document that now also <br />contains a highlighted, written entry below each applicable recommendation describing what <br />action was achieved for that recommendation. <br />Overall the department is encouraging the use of a predevelopment applicant consultation process <br />to provide better comprehensive information up front rather than response based review format. <br />More data will be linked to the City's electronic systems and internet based information for ease of <br />access. The provision of this data will also reduce the applicants need to go through some time <br />consuming steps that were prerequisites up until this point. <br />Action Required of Council: <br />Receive report. <br />Approved for City Council Agenda: <br />Corby D. Alexander, City Manager Date <br />