My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-11-21 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
City Council
>
2020's
>
2021 (2)
>
10-11-21 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2022 12:52:00 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 3:31:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
10/11/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
completed by an agency other than the County, then a copy of the plan, or an executive summary, must <br />be provided with the project submittal to receive points in this category. <br /> <br />D. Flooding Threat/Safety/ Traffic Improvements (15 Points) <br /> <br />Existing threats to property, congestion or safety issue that will be mitigated by the proposed project. <br />Fewer points will be awarded to those projects that are intended to resolve issues caused by inadequate <br />regulation by the requesting agency. The submittal should answer some or all these questions: <br /> <br /> Is the project intended to address an existing flooding hazard, roadway congestion, traffic mitigation, <br />and or mobility issue? <br /> <br /> Has documented flooding of structures, vehicular or pedestrian crash related incident occurred <br />that would be prevented or lessened in the future by the project? <br /> <br />E. Level of Protection/Level of Service/ Connectivity (10 Points) <br /> <br /> For Street and mobility projects, priorities will be given to complete street type of project and <br />project that includes future land use projection and growth. Project connectivity components will <br />also be considered as a key element. <br /> For Drainage projects, Flood return frequency protection in comparison to protection under <br />existing conditions. Preference is given to projects offering higher flood return frequency (10- <br />year to 100-year) protection. When applicable, information regarding both the anticipated design <br />level of protection and the effective level of protection, such as that provided by storm drains <br />combined with curb and gutter roadways, should be provided. <br /> <br />F. Project Area (25 Points) <br /> <br />Characteristics of the geographic area of the proposed project. The submittal should answer these <br />questions: <br /> <br /> What current population would directly and indirectly benefit from the project? <br /> What is the age of area development, and how long has the problem existed? <br /> What is the number of benefitted public buildings (schools, libraries, churches, etc.)? <br /> What amount of infrastructure (roads, drainage/flood control or wastewater facilities, etc.) would <br />benefit or be enhanced (e.g., storm drain capacity increase from 2-10 years.)? <br /> <br />G. Ancillary Benefits (12 Points) <br /> <br />Other benefits of the submitted project. Benefits may include: <br /> Water conservation/recharge opportunities (e.g., three additional points may be earned by other <br />identified ancillary benefits, if one of the following is applicable: Will promote the efficient reuse <br />of storm water? Work to sustain or increase ground water levels? Improve aquifer quality?); <br /> <br /> Low Impact Development (LID) (e.g., two additional points may be earned by other identified <br /> ¯¦ȁ Γ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.