My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
09-15-11 Planning and Zoning
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Planning and Zoning Commission
>
2010's
>
2011
>
09-15-11 Planning and Zoning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 8:10:24 AM
Creation date
7/25/2025 3:43:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
9/15/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DRAFT SEPTEMD2D'2.20D <br />Actions and Initiatives <br />1) Expand the efforts started with Ordinance 1501-11 (which <br />was intended, partly, as a means to mitigate the visual impacts <br />of container yards) to require existing non -conformities' in <br />designated enhancement corridors to be brought into <br />compliance over areasonable period oftime. Similar provisions <br />have been adopted elsewhere in Texas where nonconforming <br />site conditions (e.g, parking lot landscaping and screening <br />outdoor storage and display, fencing, buffering, siAmm8e, etc.) <br />must be registered with the City and steadily brought into <br />compliance over eperiod ofyears. <br />2) Outside ofCity limits, partner with the entities in which <br />the City has imterUoca| agreements to determine strategies to <br />increase the level of screening of container yards that exist <br />along the [ity's entry corridors and periphery. <br />3> Consider the development of corridor enhancement <br />plans for the primary and secondary enhancement corridors <br />depicted in Map 2.2, Beautification. (Additional guidance can <br />hefound /nChapter 4,Community Mobility. <br />4) Enhance the appearance of properties adjacent tustreet <br />corridors by evaluating and improving codes and standards for <br />better building placement (bmild~tn, maximum vs. minimum <br />setbacks), design (building shape, wall articulation, entry <br />identification, transparency, 300 degree architecture), and <br />materials; improved parking lot, stneetscape and foundation <br />landscaping; higher quality screening of outdoor storage; <br />management of outdoor display; improved lighting and sign <br />controls; and improved buffering ufadjacent properties. <br />S) Expand on previous efforts to consider embellished <br />gateway treatments with more significant "signature" <br />monuments, landscaping, and lighting at the locations of <br />greatest visibility. Ensure high quality maintenance of these <br />areas, asdepicted nnMap 2.2, Beautification Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.