Laserfiche WebLink
Economic Partnership, Economic Alliance Houston Port Region, Greater <br />Houston Partnership, and the Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) <br />to work towards enhancing economic development within the City. <br />Consider convening an annual meeting with partners to ensure a <br />synergistic, efficient, and coordinated plan of action is realized. <br />14)Continue with Initiate a strong business retention and expansion <br />program. While recruiting new businesses is important to growing its <br />economic base, La Porte cannot afford to ignore its current businesses <br />and risk losing one of them to closure or relocation. A strong business <br />retention and expansion program should include regular visits with local <br />employers. These visits can include formal surveys or be informal <br />interviews. However, they should establish a relationship with the <br />employer and serve as a mechanism by which the EDC Economic <br />Development Coordinatorcan ascertain any major challenges or plans <br />for expansion, and help to identify suppliers or customers who could <br />benefit from relocating to La Porte. <br />15)Budget to update the La Porte Economic Development Strategic Plan, <br />which was prepared as a five-year plan of action (2009-2013). <br />Focus Area 2 – Improved business friendliness of the City. <br />One topic that was frequently discussed during the public participation <br />“What we hear is that it <br />process was the perceived lack of business friendliness of the City with <br />takes a long time to <br />regard to how projects moved through the development process. Indeed, it <br />review plans. Developers <br />was a topic that came up in almost every small group charrette, many <br />make seven corrections, <br />stakeholder interviews, and in public meetings. It was typically framed from <br />and when it is re- <br />the standpoint that it takes longer to permit a project than it actually takes <br />to construct a project, or that it was overly difficult to permit rehabilitation <br />reviewed, there are 10 <br />or other improvement projects. Other times, it was framed as adding <br />more new things.” <br />requirements during each subsequent submittal, rather than being identified <br />Source: Interview with Louis Rigby, <br />during the original submittal. Some of this discontent may be attributed to <br />former Mayor of La Porte. <br />the normal course of doing government business. But, a large part of it may <br />be attributed to the City’s outdated zoning and development codes and <br />administrative and public approval processes. What is important, <br />Moving Forward <br />though, is for the City to dedicate time and resources to pinpoint the <br />issues, and then determine an action plan to correct them. <br />The City should consider <br /> <br />consolidating and streamlining its <br />As the City moves forward with the recommended zoning and <br />development codes and <br />development code changes contemplated throughout this <br />associated processes by <br />Comprehensive Plan Update, it is highly recommended to reach out to, <br />combining them into a single and <br />and involve, the development community in the process. Consolidating <br />comprehensive Unified <br />all the zoning and development codes into a single and comprehensive <br />Development Code (UDC). See <br />Unified Development Code (UDC) is an opportunity to implement the <br />Chapter 6, Implementation, for <br />regulatory provisions discussed in this plan, while at the same time, <br />providing an opportunity to greatly improve the administrative and <br />further information. <br />public approval processes – all of which can improve La Porte’s business <br />Source: Kendig Keast Collaborative. <br />5.11 <br /> <br />Economic <br />2. <br />11Adopted July 20, 2009 <br />Dlt <br /> <br />