My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
02-16-12 Regular, Public Hearing and Workshop Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Planning and Zoning Commission
>
2010's
>
2012
>
02-16-12 Regular, Public Hearing and Workshop Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2012 4:58:23 PM
Creation date
7/25/2025 3:44:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
2/16/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the end-product is not known. Additionally, businesses usually need <br />space on a relatively short notice, particularly for start-ups, who will not <br />have the time or resources to hire a team of professionals to navigate a <br />process for obtaining multiple zoning approvals. Indeed, undefined or <br />multiple “hoops” may cause businesses to locate elsewhere. <br /> <br />Example Guidebook <br />Goal 5.3: Conduct a thorough review of the City’s intake <br /> <br />procedures for development projects, business permits, and fee <br />structures with a view toward adopting more expedited and <br />“business-friendly” permitting processes. <br /> <br />Actions and Initiatives <br />1)Consider conducting customer service training for front desk <br />personnel and other key staff members and implementing a <br />survey tool to monitor customer satisfaction. <br />2)Establish a “streamlined permitting process” for desirable <br />developments. Develop a baseline comparison of La Porte’s <br />development review and permitting process with neighboring <br />communities (e.g., Deer Park, Pasadena, etc.). If no such <br />baseline comparison already exists, then the City should begin <br />tracking the review time for different categories of permitting. <br />Once the data has been collected, the City should hold monthly <br />or quarterly meetings with the development community to <br />review the benchmark data and obtain their feedback <br /> <br /> <br />regarding their dissatisfaction with the development process. <br />Feedback should be requested on how to improve both <br />regulations and the process. Develop a short- and long-term <br />action plan to resolve issues that do not compromise the <br />integrity of the process or conformity with established <br />regulations. Typically, the development community wants and <br />needs consistency and predictability. So, in some cases, <br />streamlining may not resolve the issue. Sometimes, larger <br />issues with the review process lie in the subjectiveness of <br />project approvals. This can be particularly evident when trying <br />to navigate the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. <br />Relevant feedback from this analysis should be presented to <br />the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. <br />3)Complete Consider creating a guidebook for the development <br />community and residents to utilize during the development <br />process. The guidebook should include descriptions of the <br /> <br /> <br />types of applications available, flowcharts of each process, <br />A well-designed development <br />tables of submittal and hearing dates, details as to where <br />guidebook can faciliate improved <br />further information may be found, and other items pertinent <br />outcomes (e.g., these pages from <br />to the successful navigation of the process. <br />Zachary, LA). <br />4)Update the website to make it easier to access information <br />required by the public to secure approval for projects. This <br /> <br />Source: Kendig Keast Collaborative. <br />5.13 <br /> <br />Economic <br />2. <br />13Adopted July 20, 2009 <br />Dlt <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.