My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-25-12 Special Called Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
Planning and Zoning Commission
>
2010's
>
2012
>
07-25-12 Special Called Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:42:13 PM
Creation date
7/25/2025 3:44:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
7/25/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />eating places, and grocery stores with limitations of scale or other design <br />parameters to ensure a character that is compatible with the adjacent <br />neighborhood. <br />5)Consider adopting Adopt a housing palette that includes dimensional <br /> <br />standards for each of several housing types. The purpose of the palette is <br />to ensure the character (size, spacing, scale) of each housing type in a <br />neighborhood or mixed housing development, such as a mixed use <br />center or traditional neighborhood development (THD). <br />The Rationale of Character-Based Land Use Districts <br /> <br /> <br />A character--based system in that each of the above <br />developments may be permitted in the same land use (or zoning) district. A use-based land use and zoning <br />system would require each of these to be in separate districts even though their relative densities and thus, <br />impacts (e.g. traffic, utility demands, etc.) are the same. In this way, while the form of development or type of <br />house may be different the character remains the same. This is so as a character-based system uses density and <br />open space measures to control and ensure the intended character. The density and open space controls <br />may hold the density constant (density neutral) or may allow a bonus as means to provide incentive to preserve <br />open space and resources or to achieve other community objectives. <br /> <br />Source: Kendig Keast Collaborative. <br /> <br />6)For the purposes of procedural streamlining and to better focus the <br /> <br />appropriate locations of uses, consider restricting the types and numbers <br />of allowable conditional uses. For those uses with performance <br />standards, make them a limited use whereby they are administratively <br />permitted subject to written standards. <br />7)Consider amending Amend the ordinance to include bufferyard <br /> <br />provisions for ensuring improved compatibility between adjacent areas <br />of different character. The bufferyards must vary according to the <br />intensity of abutting development, with a range of options (including <br />combinations of buffer width, plant density, earthen berms, and fencing) <br />to meet a specified standard of opacity. This would provide adequate <br />buggering of adjacent uses as well as street corridors. The existing <br />provisions only specify a 25 foot buffer between multi-family and single <br />family residential developments without any specification as to the type <br />of density of landscaping. <br />8)Consider establishing Establish a minimum open space ratio (OSR) within <br /> <br />residential development and landscape surface ration (LSR) within <br />nonresidential development. The ratios will vary according to the <br />2.35 <br /> <br />LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT <br />2.řś Adopted July 20, 2009 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.