Laserfiche WebLink
<br />determining the appropriate strategies to achieve the new vision <br />strategies are detailed in the remaining chapters of this plan: <br />Land Use and Character, Infrastructure and Growth Capacity, <br />Community Mobility, and Economic Development. Finally, the <br />strategies are prioritized for near- and long-term action in the <br />Implementation Chapter. <br />Community Character and Image. The general public and City <br />officials are cognizant of the need to enhance the image of the <br />City. Residents voiced a myriad of concerns about La Porte <br />character and appearance, especially citing the desire to beauti <br /> <br />the corridors. La Portezoning, land use regulations, and other <br />Many residents supported the City in <br />development ordinances, also warrant updating to achieve the <br />being proactive in using necessary <br />community character or aesthetic quality desired by residents. <br />controls to prompt property owners to <br />The City has recently undertaken some self-initiated <br />rehabilitate abandoned buildings <br />enhancement and beautification programs along its mains <br />located within the City. <br />corridors; however, to sustain a quality, attractive environment <br /> <br />will require improved (yet reasonable) development standards <br />Source: Kendig Keast Collaborative. <br />(see inset). <br />Quality of Life Improvements. During the public participation efforts, <br />discussion routinely turned to the recent quality of life improv <br />e.g., expansion of the trail system, the new spray-ground-playgr <br />Brookglen Park, improvements to the three civic and recreation c <br />the opening of Pecan Park, completion of the Gateway Project, <br />and reinvestment in the Main Street area, to name a few. It was <br />clear that these quality of life improvements had positively <br />excited all facets of La Porte; with residents and business owne <br />being equally enthusiastic. This plan will address what quality of <br />life improvements are needed and where and how they fit into <br />the overall prioritization list for implementation (see inset). <br />Addressing Mobility Issues. There are numerous challenges that <br />La Porte must face regarding its mobility system. The most <br /> <br />significant is how to accommodate increased truck traffic Excitement for the recent quality of life <br />stemming from the expansion of the Panama Canal, while being improvements, like this new trail <br />segment, permeated throughout the <br /> quality of life concerns regarding the <br />same. Equally as significant, will be the transition of State public participation process. <br />Highway (S.H.) 146 into a six-lane, limited access segment of th <br /> <br />Source: Kendig Keast Collaborative. <br />Grand Parkway (although not an officially designated part of the <br />project); a 170 mile third loop around the Houston metropolitan <br />On a smaller scale, this plan will address such issues as signal <br />increased demand for more walkable streets (via sidewalks and th <br />wide trail system), and how the regional circulator system fits <br />overall mobility system for La Porte. <br />1.17 <br /> <br />2. <br />tz Adopted July 20, 2009 <br /> <br />