My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-17-2001 La Porte Redistricting Committee Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Agendas
>
La Porte Redistricting Committee
>
2001
>
07-17-2001 La Porte Redistricting Committee Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2017 9:12:34 AM
Creation date
7/30/2025 7:30:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Minutes
Date
7/17/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
unprecleared annexations togeth~See City of Pleasant Grove v. Unitgd States, C.A. No. 80-2589 <br />(D.D.C. Oct. 7, 1981). <br />(c) Relevant factors. In making determinations with respect to annexations, the Attorney General, in <br />addition to the factors described above, will consider the following factors (among others): <br />(1) The extent to which a jurisdiction's annexations reflect the purpose or have the effect <br />of excluding minorities while including other similarly situated persons. <br />(2) 'The extent to which the annexations reduce a jurisdiction's minority population <br />percentage, either at the time of the submission or, in view of the intended use, for the <br />reasonably foreseeable future. <br />(3) Whether the electoral system to be used in the jurisdiction fails fairly to reflect <br />minority voting strength as it exists in the post-annexation jurisdiction. See City of <br />Richmond v. United States, 422 U.S. 358, 367-72 (1975). [52 FR 2648, Jan. 23, 1987] <br />(back to index) <br />51.62 Enforcement by the Attorney General. <br />(a) The Attorney General is authorized to bring civil actions for appropriate relief against violations <br />of the ,Act's provisions, including Section 5. See Section 12(d). <br />(b) Certain violations of Section 5 may be subject to criminal sanctions. See Section 12 (a) and (c). <br />(back to index) <br />51.63 Eni~orcement by private parties. <br />Privatf; parties have standing to enforce Section 5. <br />(back to inndex) <br />51.64 Bar to termination of coverage (bailout). <br />(a) Section 4(a) of the Act sets out the requirements for the termination of coverage (bailout) under <br />Section 5. See S 51.5. Among the requirements for bailout is compliance with Section 5, as <br />described in Section 4(a), during the ten years preceding the filing of the bailout action and during <br />its pendency. <br />(b) In defending bailout actions, the Attorney General will not consider as a bar to bailout under <br />Section 4(a)(1)(E) a Section 5 objection to a submitted voting standard, practice, or procedure if <br />the objection was subsequently withdrawn on the basis of a determination by the Attorney General <br />that it had originally been interposed as a result of the Attorney General's misinterpretation of fact or <br />mistab;e in the law, or if the unmodified voting standard, practice, or procedure that was the subject <br />of the objection received Section 5 preclearance by means of a declaratory judgment from the U.S. <br />District Court for the District of Columbia. <br />(c) Notice will be given to interested parties registered under S 51.32 when bailout actions are filed <br />or decided. <br />(back to index) <br />51.65 Who may petition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.