My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
01-20-04 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Audit Committee
>
2000's
>
2004
>
01-20-04 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2016 5:16:29 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:26:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Audit Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/20/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />What is the basis for judging <br />quantitative materiality? <br />In the private sector, quantitative materiality <br />normally is assessed in relation to the financial <br />statements taken as a whole. Auditors tradition- <br />ally have applied a much narrower focus when <br />assessing quantitative materiality for state and <br />local governments. In the case of the govern- <br />ment-wide fmancial statements, the assessment <br />of quantitative materiality is made separately <br />for governmental activities and business-type ac- <br />tivities. Likewise, in the fund financial state- <br />ments, the focus is on individual major <br />governmental funds and individual major enter- <br />prise funds. <br />Some governments desire that materiality also <br />be assessed separately for individual funds that <br />are not major governmental funds or major en- <br />terprise funds. This approach, known as <br />"full-scope" auditing, effectively lowers the mate- <br />riality threshold even further. Both the Govern- <br />ment Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and <br />the GASB are formally on record encouraging <br />governments to obtain full-scope audits. They be- <br />lieve that the benefits of full-scope auditing typi- <br />cally more than offset the additional costs. These <br />additional costs, however, have deterred many <br />governments from implementing this recommen- <br />dation. <br />14 AN ELECTED OFFICIAL'S GUIDE <br />What is the independent auditor's <br />report on compliance and internal <br />controls over financial reporting? <br />In an audit performed in accordance with Gov- <br />ernmentAuditing Standards (Yellow Book), au- <br />ditors are required to report on internal controls <br />tested as part of the financial statement audit. <br />In doing so, auditors must list any reportable <br />conditions that came to light as the result of <br />tests of controls, distinguishing those that are <br />material weaknesses from those that are not. <br />Auditors are not required, however, to render an <br />opinion on the overall design and operation of <br />the government's framework of internal controls. <br />Auditors also must report on compliance with <br />applicable laws and regulations. Once again, au- <br />ditors are not required to render an opinion on <br />whether the government complied with applica- <br />ble laws and regulations. They are required, <br />however, to report significant instances of non- <br />compliance discovered in the course of the finan- <br />cial statement audit. <br />As a practical matter, the report on compliance <br />and internal controls over financial reporting of- <br />ten refers readers to a separate set of findings <br />for information on specific reportable conditions <br />and specific instances ofnon-compliance re- <br />vealed in the course of the financial statement <br />audit. <br />TO AUDITING 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.