My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
01-20-04 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Audit Committee
>
2000's
>
2004
>
01-20-04 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2016 5:16:29 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:26:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Audit Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/20/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IliT7'I~®D ~IC7'I®1V <br />How does performance auditing <br />differ from a financial statement <br />audit? <br />Performance auditing shares many of its goals <br />and techniques with a financial statement audit. <br />Nonetheless, there are some very important dif- <br />ferences between the two types of auditing. <br />The scope of the typical financial statement au- <br />dit encompasses all of the transactions and <br />events affecting a government's financial state- <br />ments. Performance audits, on the other hand, <br />are typically much more narrowly focused, often <br />on a single program, department, or activity. <br />Financial statement audits also enjoy the benefit <br />of widely accepted criteria (i.e., GAAP) that de- <br />fine fair presentation. There are no such similarly <br />widely accepted standards of what constitutes eff~- <br />cient or effective performance. Accordingly, an <br />important part of the performance auditor's task <br />is to develop persuasive criteria of efficiency and <br />effectiveness to apply to each audit engagement. <br />Finally, the financial statement auditor's role is <br />limited to commenting on the financial report, <br />which is a management document. The entire re- <br />port connected with a performance audit, on the <br />other hand, is a auditor document. <br />5O AN ELECTED OFFICIAL'S GUIDE <br />Auditing plays an important role in public-sector <br />finance. Indeed, it is essential to the credibility <br />of state and local government financial report- <br />ing. Nonetheless, many key individuals, includ- <br />ing both elected officials and management, often <br />lack even a basic understanding of the goals and <br />techniques of auditing in the public sector. The <br />purpose of this booklet is to aid those without <br />specialized expertise to gain a practical under- <br />standing of what auditors do and how they do it. <br />This booklet is divided into several separate sec- <br />tions. The first section deals with auditing~ba- <br />sics, and briefly reviews the different types of au- <br />ditors and audits, as well as the standards used <br />by auditors in performing their work. <br />The second section is devoted specifically to the <br />annual financial statement audit. Among other <br />matters, this section deals with the important <br />concepts of reasonable assurance and material- <br />ity, as well as with the role of a government's <br />framework of internal controls in a financial <br />statement audit. This section also describes cer- <br />tain letters required by auditors from manage- <br />ment and legal counsel. <br />The following two sections expand upon the fi- <br />nancial statement audit section by dealing with <br />two particular types of financial statement audit <br />- the Yellow Book audit and, more narrowly, the <br />Single Audit. <br />The fifth section is devoted to the various types <br />of auditor reporting associated with different <br />types of financial statement audit engagements. <br />The discussion goes beyond auditor's reports, <br />strictly speaking, to address issues such as find- <br />ings, management letters, and questioned costs. <br />xi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.