Laserfiche WebLink
2/15/2002 • <br />8:30 am Draft <br />foreign vessels do not fall under and are immune to U.S laws and regulations <br />against the deposition of trace organotin products in the U.S. waters. <br />These organic tin compounds are leaked into the surrounding em~ironment by <br />ablative and contaminative causes designed deliberately to kill or slow marine <br />growths on hulls. <br />Certain pollutants such as lead and organic tin conzplea:es have long been <br />recognized as destructive to natural reefs and entire ecosystems. <br />The permit application continues to be silent on the impact of deepening the <br />channel from 45 feet to SO feet even though the Bayport wharves are being <br />designed fora 56 foot depth We believe it is better to understand the <br />incremental change from 45 feet to SO feet today rather than hear the Port has <br />decided to seek a permit fora 50 foot channel within the next ftve years. <br />• A potential exists for conflicts between commercial vessels and recreational boats <br />ira the reach of the Bayport Ship Channel between Bayport and the Houston Ship <br />Channel due to the increase in both commercial vessels and recreational boats. <br />The DEIS does not develop arly actions to mitigate this potential conflict except to <br />suggest that recreational boaters will voluntarily relocate to less congested a~°eas. <br />• The sailing distance from the Galveston sea buoy to the Bayport terminal is <br />approximately 36 miles. Two alternative terminal locations, Pelican Island and <br />Shoal Point have significantly less sailing distances. The DEIS indicates there <br />would be less risk of ship collisions and groundings associated with development <br />of the sites with shorter sailing distances. <br />SEWAGE <br />• Sewage from the ships and the port must be handled in a manner whereby there is <br />no chance that it will enter Galveston Bay. A system approved by the TNRCC <br />should be in place by the time operations begin. <br />WATER QUALITY <br />• The DEIS lacks discussion of current water quality for the portion of the bay that <br />would be affected by the construction of this project and subsequent increase in <br />shipping. It noted a few stations with data collected in 1997-1998 but the <br />majority is from Galveston Bay Estuary Program reports dated 1992 and 1994. <br />