Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />that the Shoal Point site was the environmentally least damaging practicable alternative <br />site in the Galveston Bay system. Bayport was evaluated as an alternative to Shoal Point. <br /> <br />At this time, the best site for a container port in the Galveston Bay system - Shoal. <br />Point - has been issued a pennit. The movement of containers into and out of the <br />Houston region is secure. The question before us now is - should a permit be issued for <br />Bayport, in addition to the permit already issued for Shoal Point? The FEIS for the <br />Bayport facility, and additional documents regarding the wetlands at that site, strongly <br />argue NO. <br /> <br />2. 56 Foot Deep HouSton Ship Channel <br /> <br />GBCP A and other groups have been concerned since the inception of this project <br />about whether or not the Houston Ship Channel would need to be deepened in order to <br />accommodate the larger container ships that are in use today in maritime commerce. <br />These larger vessels.are called post-Panamax ve.ssels and require a channel d.epth of from <br />45 to 53 feet. . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The permit application submitted by the Port of Houston Authority has always <br />shown the area adjacent to the docks being dredged to 56 feet. GBCP A and others have <br />argued that the Port is clearly planning to bring deeper draft vessels into Bayport than can <br />be accommodated by the current Houston and Bayport Ship Channels. The Bayport <br />channel is currently at 40 feet of depth and the Houston Ship Channel is now being <br />dredged to 45 feet. The third revised permit application, issued in conjunction with the <br />FEIS, now shows diagrams of cranes that are labeled as being designed to unload post- <br />Panamax vessels. Additionally, the FEIS mentions post-Panamaxvessels in several <br />places. <br /> <br />In order for post-Panamax vessels to come to Bayport, the Bayport channel must <br />be dredged deeper than 40 feet, and the Houston Ship Channel also must be deepened, <br />most likely to 56 feet. That is ten feet deeper than the current authorization. A deeper <br />channel will allow much more salt water from the Gulf of Mexico to enter the Galveston <br />Bay system. Salinity is the greatest threat to the ecological health and integrity of the <br />Galveston Bay system. Today, more and more freshwater is taken from our rivers for <br />water supply, reducing the amount that comes to our bays. The Galveston Bay system is <br />productive because it is an estuary, an area where salt and fresh water come together. <br />Salinity is the enemy of the oysterreefs. Salinity is the enemy of the juvenile fish and <br />shellfish that come to the Galveston Bay nursery. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />The reason that Shoal Point in Texas City is an excellent location for a container <br />facility is that a deeper channel in the lower portion of the bay will not cause much <br />addit~onal harm. Shoal Point is near Bolivar Roads, the pass connecting Galveston Bay <br />with the Gulf of Mexico. Salinity is naturally higher in the lower portions of the bay. <br />Bayport is in the upper bay system. If we invest $1.2 billion in Bayport, we will <br />immediately hear cries from the Port of Houston Authority that we need a deeper ship <br />channel in order to be competitive - to protect our $1.2 billion investment. <br /> <br />2 <br />