Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />30. Other alternative sites have been identified within the Galveston Bay system for <br />locating this terminal facility that are less environmentally damaging and that aze acceptable to <br />the plaintiffs. <br />31. A scoping meeting on the proposed Bayport Project was conducted by the <br />Galveston District in 1999 pursuant to the rules of the CEQ for preparing environmental impact <br />statements (EISs) and about 2,500 people attended. <br />32. A Draft EIS (DEIS) on the proposed Bayport Project was prepazed by the <br />Galveston District and released in November, 2001. <br />33. Over 6,000 people came to the Galveston District's public hearing regarding the <br />DEIS for the Bayport Project, which was conducted in December, 2001 at the George R. Brown <br />Convention Center in downtown Houston. <br />34. Numerous issues were raised by the public at the December 2001 hearing about <br />the lack of adequate analysis in the DEIS of the Bayport Project's environmental impacts, <br />including wetlands, air quality, and noise impacts, as well as reasonably foreseeable future <br />impacts to Galveston Bay. <br />35. The Galveston District has received over 2,000 comments regarding the Bayport <br />Project from not only flee public, but also local, state, and federal agencies, as well as elected <br />officials. <br />36. Included in these comments were requests for a Supplemental DEIS that would <br />address the inadequacies of the Bayport DEIS. <br />37. On May 2, 2002, GBCPA wrote to the Corps requesting a Supplemental Draft <br />EIS regarding wetlands, noise, and the alternatives analysis as well as requesting a re- <br />examination of jurisdictional wetlands. <br />7. <br />