Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />• <br />• <br />0 <br />Hon. Mayor Pro -Tern and City Commissioners <br />City of La Porte <br />Page 2 <br />11-10-75 <br />Thereafter, Mr. Brown proposed that the City of La Porte might <br />wish to agree to be bound by the outcome of the litigation, if <br />any, between the Light Company and the City of Houston on the <br />matter, as set out in the letters between those two parties, <br />without the actual necessity of the City of La Porte being a <br />party to such a suit. <br />The procedure recommended by Mr. Brown seems a reasonable one <br />to me, and I would recommend it to the City Commission. Each <br />city involved, which has a pipeline ordinance, has a similar <br />problem, and this seems an appropriate way to resolve the <br />matter, without unduly delaying the Light Company in its efforts <br />to build this line. The City of La Porte has continually <br />expressed to the Light Company that it has no objection to the <br />construction of the line, but that it feels that the Light <br />Company should comply with the terms of the City's pipeline <br />ordinance. <br />I have requested that this matter be placed on the agenda for <br />the regular meeting of November 17, 1975, so that the City <br />Commission can give me instructions as to how it wishes to <br />handle this matter. <br />KWA:jm <br />Enclosures <br />ZoYoevery truly, <br />x W. Askins <br />City Attorney <br />City of La Porte <br />