Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br /> <br />I respectfully dissent. <br />PUBLIC UTILITY COh1~~lISSION OF TEXAS <br />/i <br />SIGNED: _`_'!/ . .~.,~ <br />GEORGE M. COI~JDEN <br />SIGNED: ___ <br />G~IRRETT MORRIS <br />~~ ~ , <br />SIGNED: ___ ~ u~ <br />H. M. ROLL i~iVS ~ ^- <br />DISSENT <br />• The revenue increase is excessive by at least $22 million because of inclusion of <br />15% more CWIP than recommended by the staff. <br />The residential customer charge should not be increased from $4.50 to $5.40 and the <br />relative rate of return should not be increased for the residential class. <br />The relative rates of return adopted in Docket No. 2001 should be adopted in this <br />docket for all classes so that the increase per class should equal the system increase. <br />This is recommended because the cost allocations proposed are not more equitable than <br />those used in Docket No. 2001. <br />.ATTEST: <br />PHILIP F. RICK ~S ~ -- --' <br />SECRETARY OF T E COMMISSION <br />pd <br />Docket ,~o. 2616 <br />Page 4 <br />RENDERED AT AUSTIN, TEXAS, on this ~~ ~ day of ~ lg~g. <br />,-. <br />/~ <br />,GARRETT MORR~~ <br />COMbiISSIUNER <br /> <br />