Laserfiche WebLink
.~ _ ..... <br />• <br />~.. ~ .. <br />rat ~ ,Frgm the Office of the Fire Marshal <br />CITY OF lA PORTE <br />INTER-OFFICE MEN'i9RANDUM <br />• <br />U <br /> <br />T0: City Administrator, Jim Hudgens DATE: 2-21--80 <br />FROM: Paul R. Hickenbottom, Assistant Fire Marshal <br />SUBJECT: Amending Smoke Detector Ordinance ~~1093. <br />It has become necessary to ask that this Ordinance be <br />amended since its passage September 19, 1977, for the following <br />reasons: <br />I am requesting that Section 1 be amended because this <br />Ordinance was made a part of the 1976 Edition of the Standard <br />Buildi~.g Code with no saving clause, and when the 1979 Edition <br />of the Standard Building Code is adopted, this Ordinance will <br />have to be re-adopted. <br />I am requesting that-Section 1 be amended to include 1976 <br />Edition, or currently enforced building code., heretofore adopted. <br />In Section 1 Paragraph 2, I am requesting this amendment to <br />also include duplex and boarding house, since these were <br />inadvertently left out of the-first Ordinance. <br />Location of smoke detector section has been more clearly <br />defined because of the response'~from installers that the present <br />Ordinance was too vague. <br />Final approval is a new section. I am requesting this section <br />be included for clarification of responsibility. <br />I am requesting that Section 2 be amended to include the words <br />duplex and townhouse complex, which were inadvertently left out <br />of the first Ordinance. <br />I am requesting that Section 3 be amended to include boarding <br />house ar~d duplex, because again, they were left out of the first <br />Ordinance. <br />I am requesting that Section 4 be amended to exclude two-family <br />dwellings. <br />Section 5 stays the same. <br />