Laserfiche WebLink
_. <br />• <br />T0: <br />FRO; f <br />SUBJECT: <br />• Background <br />INTER-OFFICE ME.'fORr1i~1DL'if <br />Jack 0 ~ r~ <br />John ~ s and Jar /~odge <br />~~ <br />Amendme,4~to Indus,yrial Waste Ordinance - <br />Indu trial Surcharge Formula <br />DATE: 03-03-82 <br />On January 27, 1982 Council was approached by Resource Engineering, Inc., <br />on behalf of Atlanta Truck Wash, to discuss the unusually high surcharge rates <br />contained in La Porte's Industrial Waste Ordinance.l At that time Council <br />asked the staff to investigate the matter and return to Council with a recom- <br />mendation. <br />After meeting again with Resource Engineering and further discussions <br />with Jerry Hodge, it is my opinion that the surcharge formula in its present <br />form is not suitable for La Porte's current circumstances and recommend that <br />it be altered to a simpler ratio-type formula. The formula currently in our <br />ordinance is very similar to (and probably based on) a method suggested by the <br />• E.P.A. The E.P.A. model formula and La Porte's current formula are re-written <br />and re-arranged here fora simple comparison.* <br />odel <br />ormula Cs = Vol [Bc (BOD - 250) + Sc (SS - 300)] <br />T t ~ ~ l <br />.a Porte's <br />:urrent • <br />,urcharge ISS = Vol [0.085 (BOD - 250) + 0.056 (SS - 300)] <br />ormula <br />As you can see each element of the two formulas correlate with the <br />exception of the variables Bc and Sc. The E.P.A. formula defines Bc and <br />Sc as: <br />Bc = Operation & maintenance cost for treatment of a unit of <br />BOD <br />Sc = Operation & maintenance cost for treatment of a unit of TSS <br />_ ~'~ `I <br />