Laserfiche WebLink
13e11, <br />~~+ <br />YU~ llrop Appeal <br />By DANA PALMER <br />Harte-Hanks Austin Bureau <br />AUSTIN -Southwestern <br />Bell Telephone Co. and the <br />Public Utility Commission <br />agreed Thursday to drop all <br />court appeals involving the <br />phone company's i5o0 and <br />1981 rate cases <br />"The agree~..ent w~11 result <br />in a potential savings of over <br />;100 million to customers <br />served by Southwestern Bell," <br />a spokesman for Attorney <br />General Mark White said. <br />If the state had lost the <br />case, customers might have <br />been forced to come up with <br />the ;100 million. <br />Settlement of the lawsuits <br />came only weeks before a <br />hearing on Bell's latest rate <br />request is scheduled to begin <br />at the utility commission <br />The 1980 case had been ap- <br />pealed to the Teaas Supreme <br />Court by both Bell and the <br />PUC. Each party lost as issue <br />at the district court level <br />Meanwhile, the 1981 rate <br />case was being heard in an <br />Austin district court this sum- <br />mer before it was interrupted <br />in recent weeks by closed- <br />door settlement discussions, <br />one negotiator said. - <br />Assistant Attorney General <br />Philip Ricketts and attorneys. <br />for Bell filed for dismissal of <br />the lawsuits only hours after a <br />Public Utility Commission <br />hearings examiner set Sept. 1 <br />as the date to begin hearing <br />Bell's record request for <br />5471.5 million in additional an- <br />nual revenues. <br />Austin attorney Don Butler, <br />who represents the Teaas Mu- <br />nicipal League and dozens of <br />Teaas cities that fight Bell's <br />rate requests each year, said <br />the settlement would give Bell <br />an additional ;12.2 million. <br />The utility commission will <br />have to decide sometime later <br />this year how BeII w~11 re- <br />cover that additional revenue. <br />Several parties to the law- <br />suits' would not comment on <br />whether a temporary cu~- <br />tomer surcharge might be in- <br />stituted to provide Bell with <br />the additional ;12.2 million. <br />During a meeting with rep- <br />resentatives of various Teaas <br />cities involved in the Bell law- <br />suits, Butler noted that the <br />settlement is good for munici- <br />pal league members because <br />they won siz out of the seven <br />issues in dispute. <br />Those issues, be said, could <br />have cost ratepayers another <br />-1134.8 millioa. - -. _ - --- <br />. Bell won only the issue of li- <br />ceased contracts from the <br />1980 case. Licensed contracts <br />is the term used for payments <br />Southwestern Bell makes to <br />its parent company, AT&T, <br />for various services. <br />Among the issues the cities <br />won are the so-called out-of- <br />period adjustments, refund of <br />bonded rates, station con- <br />nection charges and non•wage <br />price adjustments. <br />Butler said the three•mem- <br />ber Public Utility Commission <br />gave its approval to the settle- <br />ment last week during a <br />closed-door session and the <br />cities gave their blessing to <br />the agreement Thursday af- <br />ternoon j~,ist before the settle- <br />ment was announced. <br />Despite the good news, sev- <br />eral city officials attending <br />the Teaas Municipal League <br />i te8~~eting <br />expressed dismay at Bell's <br />latest rate request. <br />"It does weal burdensome <br />and tiresome to come back <br />for the sixth time in sin <br />years," steering committee <br />Chavman Don James said. <br />He also noted that rate- <br />payers, should ignore Bell's . <br />claims that the request is for , <br />only a 13.4 percent increase, <br />"That's the average of the <br />total revenue request," James <br />s:id. "The impact is far, far, <br />greater on, for example, rest- ~ <br />dential customers. Their basic <br />,monthly rate will increase <br />;<1.60 a month. ); would guess <br />it (the increase) approaches <br />100 percent in some cases," <br />Looking at the utility com- <br />mission's track record oa Bell <br />rate requests, approval of the <br />full ;471.5 million is unl~ely. <br />In 1976, Bell requested <br />;298.3.. million and received <br />.;57.8 million; requested ;214.3 <br />million in 1975 and received <br />;I24.5 million; and requested <br />5143.6 million in 1979 and won <br />. X138.7 million. ~ ~, <br />As for the two rate cases in <br />court, Bell's 1980 rate request <br />was for ;326.3 million and the <br />1981 request was for ;46.9.8 <br />million. - <br />The PUC allowed the phone <br />company ;114.3 million in 1980 <br />and ;243.7 million in 1981. <br />PUC-Bell to drop <br />• <br />r~ <br />1 <br />ra ~~ncrease a peals <br />~ <br />AUSTIN 1 AP i -Southwestern acing set to begin on <br />dered at <br />Bell and the Public Utility Commis- Sept. 1. <br />sion have agreed to drop appeals of White said in a statement the <br />rate increases granted the tele- agreement between Bell and the <br />phone company in 1980 and 1981. At- PUC to dismiss the appeals could <br />torney General Mark White said save customers more than 5100 mil- <br />yesterday. lion, the approximate total of the ad- <br />The telephone company, dissatis- ded increases Southwestern Bell <br />fled with the rate increases granted wanted from the courts. <br />by PUC, had appealed the two rate "The agreement has been en- <br />orders. dorsed and is supported by the Tex- <br />The agreement came as the com- as Municipal _League's Southwest- <br />mission prepared to hear the latest ern Bell steering committee as <br />rate package filed by Southwestern being in the best interest of all cities <br />Bell. The current X471.5 million re- affected by the agreement," White <br />quest- the largest ever proposed to said. <br />the commission -will be coast- The telephone company went to <br />~' • court last year after the commission <br /> approved a ;243.7 million increase. <br /> ~ Southwestern Bell said it needed <br /> 5469.8 million. The 1981 rate in- <br /> ' crease added;1.70 per month <br /> ~ for basic residential service <br />f <br /> , <br />than the ;5.45 per month e <br /> sought by the company. f <br />