My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1983-07-20 Public Hearings and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1983-07-20 Public Hearings and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 7:55:51 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:37:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/20/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Summary of S. 66, The <br />Federal "Cable Communications Act of 1983" <br />• A. Background <br />During the past four years, the National League of Cities (NLC) and the <br />National Cable Television Association were involved in a series of intense <br />congressional battles over CATV-related legislation. Claiming that it was <br />being suffocated by municipal overregulation and overtaxation, the cable <br />industry pushed for federal legislation to severely limit the regulatory <br />authority of cities. NLC fought the legislation on the basis that municipal <br />controls were necessary to protect the interests of local cable consumers and <br />the general public. <br />Concerned that the politically -potent CATV industry would eventually prevail <br />in the congressional struggle over this issue, the NLC board of directors met <br />with the cable operators this past March and agreed to a compromise bill--S. <br />66. In early April, the TML office furnished all member cities with a <br />detailed description of the compromise. <br />With strong support from NLC and the cable industry, S. 66 handily passed the <br />U.S. Senate on June 14. The battleground has now shifted to the U.S. House of <br />Representatives, where opponents of the measure expect to have a better chance <br />of crippling or defeating the bill. <br />As is indicated below, the so-called "compromise" to which NLC agreed is <br />heavily biased in favor of the cable industry. Cities currently exercise vir- <br />tually unlimited CATV regulatory powers; however, if S. 66 becomes law, many <br />of those powers will be abolished and CATV operators will be free to do pretty <br />much as they please at the local level. <br />B. Key Provisions of S. 66 <br />1. Abolishment of City Regulation Over Basic Service Rates <br />For a 5-year period after the effective date of S. 66 (or one-half of the <br />remaining life of the city's franchise, whichever is greater), cities could <br />continue to regulate monthly subscriber rates for basic (Tier One) services. <br />But, during that period, local cable operators would have the unilateral <br />authority --without the city's consent --to make yearly increases in Tier One <br />service rates in an amount equivalent to the increase in the Consumer Price <br />Index. Upon the expiration of 5 years, the regulatory powers of cities over <br />Tier One rates would be totally abolished, and local cable operators would be <br />free to increase basic service charges without limitation. (Note: Two excep- <br />tions from this provision are provided. Upon expiration of the 5-year transi- <br />tion period, municipal ratemaking powers would be continued: (a) in any city <br />where 80% or more of all households subscribe to the basic service offered by <br />the particular franchisee; and (b) in any city served by fewer than four TV <br />broadcasting stations. Even in those cities, however, cable operators would <br />still have the unilateral right to impose annual increases according to the <br />rate of increase in the Consumer Price Index.) <br />2. Abolishment of City Regulation Over Other Rates <br />• For Tier -Two and Tier -Three services, city rate regulation would totally <br />expire upon the effective date of S. 66. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.