My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1983-07-20 Public Hearings and Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1983-07-20 Public Hearings and Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 7:55:51 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:37:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/20/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 <br />E <br />• Page 10 <br />PROHIBITION OF COMMON CARRIER OR UTILITY REGULATION <br />No common carrier or utility regulation. Section 614, which pro- <br />hibits common carrier or utility regulation of .any service pro- <br />vided over a cable system other than basic telephone service, <br />will effectively prohibit the substitution of state regulatory <br />requirements for franchise requirements. If traditional public <br />utility regulation of cable systems is not restricted, a state <br />public service commission (PSC) may prohibit or impose unreasona- <br />ble conditions on the provision of two-way services over cable <br />systems. Assertion of PSC jurisdiction over these services, as <br />is occurring in several states, will mean that franchise require- <br />ments governing the provision of two-way services are nullified <br />and superseded. <br />.Affect on leased access requirements. Section 614 does not <br />affect provisions of franchise agreements requiring the set aside <br />of system capacity for leased access or guaranteeing access to <br />the system, including the institutional networks, on a nondis- <br />criminatory basis. Section 614 prohibits the unilateral imposi- <br />tion of common carrier or utility regulation, but does not pro- <br />hibit the establishment of such regulation through franchise <br />negotiations. <br />EFFECTIVE DATE <br />Grandfathering. Access, service, and facility requirements in <br />existing franchises or those resulting from any RFP issued prior <br />to October 1, 1982 are grandfathered. Required payments or fees <br />to facilitate the use of access channels in existing franchises <br />are not affected by the five percent cap on franchise fees. The <br />regulation of basic service rates in communities for which dereg- <br />ulation of rates is required is grandfathered under existing <br />franchises for the longer of five years or one half the remaining <br />life of the franchise. California law governing regulation of <br />basic service rates is grandfathered for the longer of five years <br />or the remaining life of the franchise. <br />Other provisions. Other provisions of the bill, including the <br />franchise renewal, privacy, and ownership provisions, take effect <br />on the bill 's date of enactment (Sec. 4). Under section 2(b), <br />however, franchise requirements and other laws which are not <br />grandfathered by the bill and are in conflict with the bill's <br />requirements may remain in effect until six months after enact- <br />ment of the bill. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.