Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />Dallas Morntg News 7/3/83 <br />• AT&T split promises <br />C� <br />0 <br />telephone <br />., <br />By Jackie Calmes <br />Austin Bureau of The News <br />AUSTIN — Next Jan. 1, after a <br />night of New Year's revelry, most <br />Americans will awake to the begin- <br />ning of a revolution and the end of <br />the world as phone users know it. <br />Jan. 1 is the effective date, after <br />two years of preparation, of a court - <br />approved settlement of the U.S. Jus- <br />tice Department antitrust suit <br />against American Telephone & <br />Telegraph Co. Fifty years of low- <br />cost phone service, which Bell pro- <br />vided in exchange for monopoly <br />status, will come to an end. <br />Texans received a preview of <br />the coming age last month,, when <br />Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. <br />filed a request for $1.7 billion in in- <br />creased revenues — the largest <br />su:n ever sought by a U.S. utility <br />company. <br />If the request were approved by <br />the Public Utility Commission, <br />which has six months to decide the <br />historic case, local phone line rates <br />would triple. The benefits, Bell offi- <br />cials predict, would be lower long- <br />distance rates that might offset lo- <br />cal -rate increases for customers <br />who make many long-distance <br />calls, a wider choice of phone <br />equipment and a technology race <br />among AT&T and its competitors <br />that probably would reshape Amer- <br />ican business. - <br />The Texas case has its roots in <br />the 1974 Justice Department deci- <br />sion to sue AT&T for antitrust vio- <br />lations. For seven years, AT&T <br />fought back. Finally, in January <br />1982, the company and the govern- <br />ment announced a pact to make the <br />industry competitive. <br />The details of divestiture, after <br />18 months, are nearly complete. <br />But when experts met in San Fran-- <br />cisco recently to discuss "The New <br />Telecommunications Market- <br />place," one thing was clear: No one <br />was sure what the results will be: <br />Joseph Fogarty of the Federal <br />Communications Commission com- <br />plained that "the Justice Depart - <br />went pursued: competition for com- <br />petition's sake - without any re- <br />gard for the ultimate effect on <br />ratepayers." <br />But Forgarty said the FCC <br />shares some blame. <br />"We had no battle plan. We had <br />no strategy whatsoever," Fogarty <br />said. "It was piecemeal. There was <br />nobody planning in Washington <br />for the ultimate impact." <br />The Dallas Morning News: Sharon Roberts <br />But Ronald G. Carr, a former <br />Justice Department attorney in the <br />antitrust case, said he "never <br />doubted it would be good public <br />policy to break up AT&T." <br />After Jan. 1, AT&T will shed all <br />but about $40 billion of an esti- <br />mated k55 billion in assets. The <br />still -gigantic company will have <br />five parts: the Long Lines division <br />for long-distance service, Bell Labs <br />and Western Electric for inventing <br />and manufacturing equipment, <br />AT&T International for foreign op. <br />erations and the new American <br />Bell, or "Baby Bell," to market <br />