My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1985-03-20 Regular Meeting La Porte City Council
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1985
>
1985-03-20 Regular Meeting La Porte City Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:59 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:40:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/20/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• • • <br />A <br />TML <br />Summary Statement <br />On <br />H.B. 1330 & S.B. 897 <br />In response to organized citizen groups who felt a proliferation of billboards <br />had created visual pollution, traffic hazards and property devaluation, Texas <br />cities initiated billboard regulation in the early 1970's. Municipal officials <br />adopted ordinances regulating the height, area and location of signs and bill- <br />boards. Existing billboards that were not in compliance with the regulations <br />became non-conforming and may be subject to removal or reconstruction after a <br />specified period of time. These "amortization" periods permit the owners of <br />non-conforming billboards to recoup their investment prior to compliance with <br />the ordinance. This concept of compensation has been litigated and upheld in <br />Texas courts, numerous other state courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The <br />ability to regulate billboards in this manner is consistent with the long stand- <br />ing state policy of home rule and local control. <br />The billboard industry is attempting during this session of the legislature to <br />limit cities ability to effectively regulate signs and billboards. Important <br />considerations of this proposed legislation are as follows: <br />• Increased attention to billboard regulation by municipalities has <br />been in response to active citizen groups who have voiced growing <br />concern about the effects of the proliferation of billboards on <br />their communities. <br />• The authority of cities to "regulate, control or prohibit signs <br />or billboards" is specifically enumerated in state statute <br />(Article 1175, V.T.C.S.) and has been in existence since 1913. <br />• Municipal authority to regulate private activities for the <br />benefit of the public safety and welfare is inherent in constitu- <br />tional authority and is essential to the ability of municipal- <br />ities to govern responsibly. <br />• Amortization is a fair, just, and reasonable method of compensa- <br />tion for removal or reconstruction of non-conforming signs and <br />billboards. This method of compensation has been litigated and <br />upheld by state and federal courts on numerous occasions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.