1988-09-12 Public Hearings, Revenue Sharing, Budget Hearing, and Regular Meeting

Browse Search

~-'<-"': _ _ -- .~,'"!o~~ '~~-...r:., ;F~ e e EXCERPTED TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING AND REGULAR MEETING OF LA PORTE CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 10, 1987 Councilperson Llovd: I guess I would like to address "'-that same question to Mr. Paulissen. Boat storage, my understanding, is not covered in any of the classifications. At least this is my read ing from way back when. Where does it best fit? Would it best fit in a,' neighborhood commercial with conditions or do you put that in industrial or where? David Paulissen. Buildin~ Official: Okay, a~ this point I feel like Staff can support the neighborhood commercia! with conditional use in the use tables. Again keeping in mind what the conditional use is designed to do is to .... Again a conditional use permit impac'ts a zone more substantially than just, a permittid use unless you and the Plann ing and Zon ing Commiss ion rev iew each of those. uses before it goes in. I think that you have a good boat storage facility and then you have the'norm. and I think what we're interested in is getting a good boat storage facility and I think Staff can support neighborhood commercial with a conditional use in the use table which would require fencing or screening. It would also require that the parking lot be surfaced to control dust and all light sources are hooded from the surrounding neighborhood and that sort of thing. Again, based on what Planning and Zoning had to go on and the fact at the time, Staff had to concur with Planning and Zoning at the time. The developer has done a considerable amount of homeHork and at this point the facts that were presented tonight were not presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission. In 1 ight of that, we can support Neighborhood Commercial with a Conditional Use. Councilperson Llovd: David, I probably ought to say I shouldn't put you on the spot, but I enjoyed it. Counc il person Matuszak: - I have one further question to Mr. Gray or Janet, one of them. Which is a concern on my part. Will the removal of this particular tract make the R-3 of the remaining part of that tract any less useable or workable? Eddie Gray: We considered that. I think there is enough depth on the north side of this ~ract on up to the north boundary so that the R-3 use starting down at Fairmont Park with a nice entrance, off of -that, could come up and wrap around this without distracting from the use of the R-3. It's still separated from all the rest of the property by an R-3 area. I don't know that this boat storage should affect the R-1 area just north of the R-3. .. " Councilperson Matuszak: So in effect this wouldn't be, this particular rezoning wouldn't be used as a stepping stone to the next one, so to speak, for further rezoning of this R-3 property as it gets smaller. I think you've answered my question. EXHIBIT D