Laserfiche WebLink
• ~ RECEIVED <br />~~ -/~ ~9~ <br />COMM. DEV. <br />CITY OF LA PORTE <br />INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />T0: Alex Osmond, Golf Professional <br />FROM: Jeff Litchfield, Director of Finance <br />DATE: October 10, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Bids for Golf Cars <br />I have reviewed the Golf Car Bids from a financing viewpoint. In order to <br />determine the payment option that is best for the City, it is necessary to <br />determine the present value of the various options. <br />The present value is the measuring stick in this instance because we want to <br />determine how much the financing is costing us as compared to our earnings on <br />the money we will be able to keep until a later payment date. <br />The present value amounts, at eight percent interest, for the three options <br />are listed below. <br /> Present Value <br />Option Payment Date Cash Payment of payment <br />1 11/01/90 93,042.00 93,042.00 <br />2 11/01/90 27,860.00 27,860.00 <br /> 5/01/92 74,536.92 66,134.64 <br /> Total 102,396.92 93,994.64 <br />3 11/01/90 0 0 <br /> 5/01/91 15,664.90 15,052.66 <br /> 11/01/91 44,042.45 40,667.10 <br /> 5/01/92 44,042.45 39,077.70 <br /> Total 103,749.80 94,797.46 <br />As you can see, the present value payment for option 1 is the most cost <br />effective, however, it requires a total cash outlay of $93,042.00. Because we <br />want to extend payment of the cars over the life of the cars (matching <br />principal), option 2 is the most beneficial of the other two options. <br />I recommend the cars be paid for under a financing plan similar to option 2. <br />It will require a cash payment of $27,860 this fiscal year and a payment of <br />$74,536.92 next fiscal year. <br />If I can be of any further help, please let me know. <br />