Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />:'.~:!~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Eric C. (Rick) Vertz <br />Tax Counsel <br /> <br />~ LYONDELL <br /> <br />One Houston Center <br />1221 McKinney, Suite 1600 <br />P.O, Box 3646 <br />Houston, Texas 77253-3646 <br />Tel 713 652-7456 <br />Fax 713 951-1628 <br /> <br />September 25, 2000 <br /> <br />i ("J i2 (;, .,- <br />I; ~ LL;' <br />iIJtr'-,-,,-',.__ <br />I: :.(' <br />II ii,; <br />IUU i SEP 2 7 2UlJu <br />L ' <br /> <br />AC"rr e,T',/", -J <br />vv. ;, ;"if"'~/.\GER <br />r;FF=:CE <br /> <br />Mr. John Joems <br />Assistant City Manager <br />City of La Porte <br />P.O. Box 1115 <br />La Porte, Texas 77572-1115 <br /> <br />Re: La Porte IDA <br /> <br />Dear John: <br /> <br />Enclosed are the following: <br /> <br />Battleground Water Distribution Company <br /> <br />The signed IDA contract for Battleground Water Distribution Company. As you correctly <br />state in your letter dated September 20,2000, the Battleground Water Distribution <br />Company is not a "company" at all; rather, it is simply a cost sharing arrangement <br />among four companies to build and maintain a process water pipeline that runs through <br />the Industrial District. Equistar is the current manager. As an aside, the companies <br />refer to this as the "Distribution" Company, not "Supply" Company. I have executed the <br />contracts in the name of the Battleground Water Distribution Company. <br /> <br />Lyondell Chemical Company <br /> <br />Enclosed is the executed acknowledgement and warranty that the previous Exhibits "A" <br />and "B" are still current for the Lyondell Chemical Company contract. I previously mailed <br />you the executed Lyondell contract (which, I'm embarrassed to admit, I found in my in <br />box shortly after requesting another copy from you). <br /> <br />This should complete the execution and filing of La Porte Industrial District contracts for <br />Equistar Chemicals and Lyondell Chemical Company. <br /> <br />Annexed Area <br /> <br />I know that La Porte does not have the problem with HCAD that confronts Deer Park <br />regarding annexed land. Does La Porte have a plat map or any sort of survey that <br />shows the annexed portion of the land that is included in the La Porte contract's <br />computation? It's rather academic, given the mechanics of the contract's computations, <br />but several companies, mine included, have wondered where the line gerrymanders. If <br /> <br />Lyondell PetrochemicatCompany <br />