My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2002-11-11 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2002
>
2002-11-11 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 8:01:12 AM
Creation date
7/31/2025 10:59:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
11/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 r <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Progressive enforcement of the Solid Waste Ordinance will be used to deal with <br />commercial and vacant lot trash, and container violations (ROW and adjacent <br />accumulations). Excessive trash will be referred to the City's commercial contractor, or <br />collected by City forces as time permits. In both cases, the resident will be billed for <br />actual cost on the next utility bill. <br />The most common and unsightly violation of the Ordinance involves placement of heavy <br />trash more than five (5) days before the next scheduled collection day. Discussions with <br />the City Prosecutor reveal that in order for a citation to be enforceable, it must be proven <br />that the violator knew it was a violation. <br />It can be argued that prior notice has been provided in letters, articles and heavy trash <br />schedules and calendars, however this must be tested in Municipal Court. If prior notices <br />are used, the City may begin issuance of citations to any and all violators after the first <br />offense. Currently, we see an average of 30 violations per zone per pickup cycle. This <br />would equate to approximately 150 tickets issued every 2-'/z weeks. <br />Another alternative is to continue to place door hangers, noting addresses for violations. <br />Citations would only be issued for repeat violators. This method would result in an <br />average of approximately 3-5 violations per zone, or 15 — 25 tickets every 2-'/2 weeks. <br />The Prosecutor feels that this method of notice is better, but still may not meet the <br />standards for every case. <br />The best alternative in terms of legal notice is to issue a warning citation, or in the <br />absence of the resident, a certified letter from the Court. This method is also the most <br />expensive and time consuming, in terms of postage and employee time. Repeat violation <br />would result in a citation. <br />Receipt of a citation will result in a mandatory court appearance, unless the violator is <br />willing to pay the $2,000 fine before the scheduled court appearance. The Ordinance <br />does not contain a progressive fine schedule, so the violator is forced to a court <br />appearance, with the judge assessing the appropriate fine. One solution is to revise the <br />ordinance with a progressive fine schedule. An example would be $100 for first <br />violation, $200 for second violation, $500 for third violation and so on. This might result <br />in fewer actual court cases, as violators could pay the appropriate fine without a <br />scheduled court appearance, similar to traffic fines. <br />Enforcement of other violations discussed above can be implemented easily. No prior <br />notice is required to enforce these provisions. Enforcement through the Solid Waste <br />Division will be accomplished by the Superintendent and Supervisor. With 21 <br />employees and associated budget to manage, and normal complaint and inquiry <br />resolution, the ability of these employees to provide solid waste enforcement will be <br />limited. The record -keeping requirements, especially if prior notice must be proven, will <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.