My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2004-12-13 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2004
>
2004-12-13 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:20 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:02:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/13/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Houston-Galveston Area Council <br />DRAFT 2025 Regional Transportation Plan <br /> <br />AASHTO guidelines are flexible, and cost-effective designs are available, especially <br />in areas not subject to flooding or where lower usage is projected. H-GAC's <br />Guidelines for Accommodating Pedestrians and Bicyclists provides a range of <br />recommendations for off-road bikeways, based on AASHTO guidelines. <br /> <br />. Design - Another common bikeway design problem in the TMA concerns the <br />striping of bike lanes on existing roadways that are not well suited for bicycle <br />travel. Smooth pavement, proper placement of gutter seams, and orientation of <br />storm sewer grates are all key features of safe on-road facilities. If existing <br />roadway conditions are unsuitable, it may be desirable to defer striping of a bike <br />lane until the roadway is scheduled for resurfacing. <br /> <br />. Maintenance - Regular maintenance is a critical factor for on- and off-street <br />facilities. Cracked or uneven pavement, debris, low-hanging limbs, missing signs <br />and deteriorated striping can pose greater safety threats to a bicyclist than to a <br />motorist. A program to provide an appropriate level of maintenance should be a <br />component of any project plan, including street sweeping and repairs to cracked <br />pavement. <br /> <br />Funding <br /> <br />Most federal funding support for bikeway projects in the TMA has come from the <br />Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) or STEP programs. However, both of these <br />programs have drawbacks with respect to implementing a regional bikeway network. <br /> <br />. CMAQ - A problem with the use of CMAQ funding is the difficulty in <br />calculating air quality benefits from bikeway projects. This deficiency could be <br />addressed by the availability of better data and tools for projecting facility usage. <br />H-GAC has completed the before stage of a before and after study to determine <br />prototypical usage levels for facilities in a variety of settings. Consideration <br />should be given to completing this study or developing other measures for <br />calculating project benefits. Such information would also be helpful in justifying <br />bikeway expenditures and prioritizing projects, regardless of funding source. <br /> <br />. STEP - It is also difficult to ensure implementation of regional bikeway <br />initiatives through STEP funding, since these project selection decisions are <br />made by TxDOT in Austin without input from the Metropolitan Planning <br />Organization (MPO). H-GAC will work with TxDOT to enable better local input <br />into the STEP project selection process. <br /> <br />. Safety Funds - A previously untapped source of funding for bicycle and <br />pedestrian improvements is federal transportation safety funds. H-GAC has <br />initiated a safety study in the East End of Houston using this funding source and <br />will pursue this funding mechanism in other areas with high incidences of bicycle <br />crashes. <br /> <br />. Blended Funding - Opportunities for blended project funding should also be <br />considered. For example, on-street bicycle and pedestrian accommodations could <br />be funded through CMAQ or STEP funds, with STP funds supporting <br /> <br />Appendix C Regional Bikeway Plan and Design Guidelines <br /> <br />Page 10 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.