My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
06-23-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee Minutes
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
2008
>
06-23-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2017 5:26:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:18:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Drainage and Flooding Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
6/23/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. The 26 repetitive flood loss properties in the study area have made a total of 134 claims <br />for a total of $3,358,943.00 since 1978. <br />. Other properties have been flooded but are not on FEMA's RL list <br />. Of the 26 repetitive flood loss properties, 24 are considered severe repetitive flood loss <br />properties. <br />. Average RL flood claim is $25,000. <br />. Residents report maximum flood depths and duration of four feet for 24 hours. <br />. Flooding is caused by undersized channels and bridge crossings, man-made obstructions <br />to the predominant flow pattern, and a slow moving drainage ditch. <br />. Drainage improvements have been made, however the area continues to flood. <br /> <br />Step 3: Mitigation Measures <br /> <br />Reviewing the drainage system, the flooding problem, and the types and condition of the <br />buildings in the area leads to the third step in the area analysis procedure - a review of alternative <br />approaches to protect properties from future flood damage. Property owners should look at these <br />alternatives but understand they are not all guaranteed to provide 100% flood protection. Seven <br />approaches were analyzed: <br /> <br />1. Drainage improvements <br />2. Acquisition of properties in the hazardous area <br />3. Elevating the houses above the 100- year flood level <br />4. Constructing small levees or floodwalls around one or more houses <br />5. Dry floodproofmg <br />6. Development regulations <br />7. Purchasing flood insurance coverage on the building <br /> <br />Each approach has its pros and cons. Drainage improvements and development regulations need <br />to be implemented by the City or County. The other measures can be implemented by the <br />property owners, but City or County funding can help, especially with acquisition and elevation. <br /> <br />I. Drainage Improvements <br /> <br />As noted in the problem description (page 8), repetitive flooding in Brookglen is caused by two <br />related drainage problems: <br />1. The storm sewers are undersized to handle a heavy rain event <br />2. The two drainage ditches, West Plantation Ditch and Willow Springs Bayou, drain slowly <br />and back up into the neighborhood streets, yards and houses during heavy rains. <br /> <br />Larger storm sewers are suggested by the Harris County All Hazard Mitigation Plan and by the <br />Klotz Associates Report #2. The City of La Porte now designs storm sewers to handle flow from <br />a three-year event, however the Harris County Flood Control District Policy Criteria and <br />Procedure Manual calls for storm sewers to be designed for 10 to 100-year storm. <br /> <br />Brookglen Area Analysis - DRAFT <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />9/8/2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.