My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
10-13-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
LaPorte
>
.Minutes
>
Drainage and Flooding Committee
>
2008
>
10-13-08 Drainage and Flooding Committee minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2017 5:26:17 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 11:18:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Drainage and Flooding Committee
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/13/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />k lot z 4~. ass 0 cia t e 5 <br /> <br />Concluding Remarks <br /> <br />To maximize the effectiveness of proposed drainage improvements and minimize future drainage <br />problems, the City should rigorously enforce drainage criteria and standards. Future fInished <br />floor slab and critical roadway elevations should be established. Provisions for sheet flow relief <br />pathways and assurance of adequate capacity in new sewers systems which meet upgraded City <br />criteria should be enforced. Construction in flood hazard zones and flood-prone areas should be <br />avoided as much as possible. And, to the extent that they are not already in place, agreements <br />need to be developed between the City and HCFCD to assure adequate levels of channel <br />maintenance to maintain channel conveyance. <br /> <br />Implementation of recommended projects can initially focus upon very cost effIcient, less <br />expensive projects such as relief swales, which can be relatively easily implemented. Larger, <br />more complex projects to address flooding problems along channels as well as detailed analysis <br />of some storm sewer systems should follow. The more complex flood protection projects will <br />require more effort to implement, but will provide a high level of flood protection. Selection of <br />the more cost effIcient alternatives will usually facilitate project implementation. Impacts of <br />recommended improvements should be recognized and appropriate mitigation implemented. <br />Regional detention opportunities should be explored when impacts lie or have their source <br />beyond City boundaries. <br /> <br />Projects can be implemented individually and are not contingent upon each other; sequencing of <br />projects can be used to implement a series of projects over time. While guidance has been <br />provided to assist in deciding which projects should receive priority for implementation, the <br />decisions as to the priorities for construction of improvement projects is, in the fInal analysis, the <br />responsibility of City leaders. <br /> <br />EN - 15 <br /> <br />Klotz Associates Project No. 0127.008.000 <br />January 2009 <br /> <br />La Porte Citywide Drainage Study <br />City ofLa Porte <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.